Showing posts with label neurology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neurology. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Musicians’ Focal Dystonia: Immunogenicity of Conventional Botulinum Toxin vs. Xeomin®

Dystonia Foundation
T  he ability of botulinum toxin to inhibit acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction has been exploited for use in medical conditions characterized by muscle hyperactivity. As such, botulinum toxin is widely recommended by international treatment guidelines for movement disorders and it has a plethora of other clinical and cosmetic indications... The chronic nature of these conditions requires repeated injections of botulinum toxin, usually every few months. Multiple injections can lead to secondary treatment failure in some patients that may be associated with the production of neutralizing antibodies directed specifically against the neurotoxin. This is because [conventional formulations of—] botulinum toxin type A [are] a 150 kD protein produced by Clostridium botulinum, which exists in a complex with up to six additional proteins. The complexing proteins may act as adjuvants and stimulate the [undesired; immunotoxicity; hypersensitivity] immune response.”
  —  Reiner Benecke, Dept of Neurology, Univ Rostock.
T here have in recent weeks been a variety of inquiries from CMT blog readers about whether there are new developments in the treatment of focal dystonia in musicians. Specifically, the inquiries have concerned two things: (1) the recent FDA approval of a new formulation of botulinum toxin by Merz Pharma, called Xeomin®, and (2) recent clinical trials of an antibiotic, minocycline, that crosses the blood-brain barrier and is known to have certain neuroprotective properties in preclinical in vitro testing and animal models.

T here is not yet enough evidence regarding minocycline’s efficacy in neurological conditions—and no controlled studies of it at all yet in musician’s focal dystonia. Nonetheless, I include some links below, to make it convenient for you to explore on your own, or keep tabs on the clinical trials’ status via the ClinicalTrials.gov website.

H owever, there is substantial published evidence regarding Xeomin®, the new formulation of botulinum toxin—one that does not contain significant amounts of complexing proteins and that therefore does not elicit undesired antibody production over the months that are required for effective dystonia treatment.

C ompared to the 10% to 40% or higher secondary failure rates due to immunogenicity experienced with BoTox® or Dysport® conventional formulations over periods of 2 years’ treatment or longer, the rate for Xeomin®is significantly lower—apparently less than 7% based on the past 2 years’ observational evidence that has accrued thus far in a U.S. datawarehouse that I use in my health informatics “day job”.

O ut of interest, I used the R statistical software package ‘prodlim’ to prepare a Kaplan-Meier regression for data on patients treated with conventional botulinum toxin formulations. Below is the result: a K-M plot of percentage without secondary failure, as a function of treatment duration in days. Basically, you have treatment failure if in the passing months your body produces antibodies that prevent the botulinum toxin from working and you have to stop the treatment because of the antibodies/hypersensitivity/non-efficacy prior to achieving successful resolution of your focal dystonia. You have “burned a bridge” insofar as the failed treatment has conditioned your body to make those antibodies against the botulinum toxin; in general, you can’t just go off-treatment for awhile and resume it: re-treatment with the drug will cause your immune system to make yet more antibodies and you’ll have treatment failure and perhaps worse immunotoxicity adverse events the next time around. Hence, the vigorous interest and the flurry of recent inquiries I’ve received here at CMT subsequent to FDA’s approval of Xeomin® 2010 and particularly since this month’s publication of Reiner Benecke’s journal article (link and pdf below).
Kaplan-Meier

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Musicians’ Focal Dystonia Update 2011

Focal dystonia
L    osses incurred in the wounding and in the healing both serve as ‘seeds’ for growth. We cannot wish away the loss, so it is well if we accept the seeds and nurture them, and see what fruit they bear.”
T here have been several dozen readers (TCP/IP addresses in U.S., Canada, U.K., Greece, Italy, Germany) who have landed on this blog in the past 2 weeks by searching Google with “focal dystonia” and related phrases. Some of them used the phrase ‘personalized medicine’ or ‘genomics testing’ as part of their Google search. In response, I want to provide some new resources, beyond ones in my previous focal dystonia-related posts in past years (links below). It is not my intent that all of the resources will be relevant to everybody who reads this post, only that some of the materials will be useful to some of the readers.

W hile I do not have dystonia myself, I know a couple of musicians who do have it. They developed it after years of intensive performance and work at leading conservatories, after achieving mastery of their respective instruments and after having embarked on promising concert careers. For each of these friends, the condition was career-changing. Both are now teaching, primarily; the shift in their attention is source of much joy and satisfaction, surely, and a fantastic treasure in terms of effective, practical pedagogy imparted to the next generation. But it comes at tremendous cost, in terms of foregone income and beauty—performances and recordings prevented, in careers hobbled by focal dystonia.

M y interest in keeping track of current state-of-the-art with regard to diagnosing and treating focal dystonia is in direct proportion to the distress and disappointment I have witnessed in these friends. Besides the recent spate of anonymous searches and CMT page-views, the emails I receive from CMT readers confirm that this condition frequently goes unrecognized or un-diagnosed for years, depending on whether there are dystonia-experienced clinicians accessible to you, ones who specialize in caring for musicians or other performing artists. In other words, if a doctor has never ever seen a case of dystonia before, the probability that he/she will diagnose one now is disproportionately low. This problem is compounded by the fact that focal dystonia does not have obvious signs and symptoms when seen in the clinic.

W ith the intensifying interest in relatively inexpensive direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing from deCODE and 23andme and other companies and with recent years’ trend toward consumers’ taking progressively greater responsibility for diagnosing and managing their own health conditions, I gather together links below, links to the most recent research literature that bears on genetics and genomic polymorphisms that might enable musicians to look at their DTC genomics tests’ raw file download results and bring that evidence with them when they meet with their physicians. Given that the spectrum of focal dystonia is quite broad and pleomorphic, maybe this will help musicians to take charge of the situation, especially if the doctors seem too inclined to ‘wait and see’ or discount the severity of what the patient in front of them is complaining of. Even if the physician has no prior experience with genomics tests per se, it is hard for the physician to be dismissive when the patient in front of him/her is knowledgeable and comes bearing specific evidence with the expectation the evidence will be discussed.

I n this regard, if one of my friends who has focal dystonia discovered that he does have one of the dystonia-associated genomic polymorphisms, then that discovery might be helpful to him and his wife with regard to preventing dystonia in their kids, insofar as the intensity and duration of musical-instrument practice are strongly correlated with triggering the onset of dystonia. One can be a genetic carrier of the genetic variation but remain asymptomatic so long as one doesn’t hit the trigger-point in terms of over-use or over-training. If you are a parent, such information would surely modulate how you approach the musical education of your children...

A t present, researchers have recognized multiple forms of dystonia that have strong association with genetic variations. They have so far identified multiple genes and chromosomal locations responsible for various forms of dystonia. Most of these are rarer and more severe forms than the focal variety that is seen in musicians. But the same genes—and some of the same variations/mutations—have been found to be involved in cases of musicians’ dystonia.
  • DYT1 (TOR1A) – Early onset-primary dystonia
  • DYT2 () – Autosomal recessive primary dystonia
  • DYT3 (TAF1) – X-linked dystonia
  • DYT4 () – Non-DYT1 spasmodic ‘whispering dysphonia’ [singing]
  • DYT5 (GCH1) – Dopa-responsive dystonia
  • DYT6 (THAP1) – Adolescent-onset mixed-type dystonia
  • DYT7 () – Adult-onset primary dystonia
  • DYT8 (MR1) – Paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia
  • DYT9 () – Paroxysmal choreoathetosis with dystonic spasticity
  • DYT10 () – Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia
  • DYT11 (SGCE) – Myoclonus dystonia
  • DYT12 (ATP1A3) – Rapid-onset dystonia-Parkinsonism (RDP)
  • DYT13 () – Early- and late-onset focal dystonia
  • DYT15 () - Alcohol-responsive myoclonic dystonia
  • DYT16 (PRKRA) - Dystonia-Parkinsonism
  • DYT17 () - Segmental or generalized dystonia with dysphonia [singing]
  • DYT18 (SLC2A1)
  • DYT19 () - Episodic kinesigenic dyskinesia 2
  • DYT20 () - Paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia 2
T o the reader who recently emailed me, the Phe205Ile (613T>A; see Calakos 2010, link below) polymorphism in the TOR1A gene on Chr. 9 is associated with jaw/embouchure dystonia in the cases that have been studied to-date, although there may be other genes and polymorphisms associated with that condition/phenotype, too. Unfortunately, this particular SNP polymorphism is not included at this time in the microarray chips that 23andme and deCODEme use for their DTC genomics testing, and it is not available in other presently-available tests either so far as I can tell. There are, however, 7 TOR1A SNPs and 4 TOR1B SNPs that are tested, 16 SNPs in the GCH1 gene, 9 SNPs in SGCE, 2 SNPs in ATP1A3, 6 in MR1, 2 in PRKRA, 2 in TAF1, and so on. These are there in your 23andme raw file download results, ready for you to look at and see whether you do or don’t have a variant polymorphism at one or more of these SNP locations.

A t any rate, there seems to be a pent-up demand for resources, links, referrals, anything at all—an unmet need for new information or updates, year-to-year—plus a considerable amount of new information that has accumulated since I last put up a blog post on this topic. Which is why I gather these things and put them up online right now.

M usicians’ dystonia is a task-specific movement disorder that produces cramping and loss of voluntary motor control of muscles that are involved in highly-trained movements associated with performing music. About 1% of all professional musicians develop musicians’ dystonia, although the percentage may be considerably higher since there are many whose condition is never definitively diagnosed and many whose change of career never comes to the attention of researchers who write the journal articles reporting the nominal 1% prevalence figure.

T he pathophysiology of the disorder is not completely clarified. Findings in neurophysiology testing include reduced inhibitory signals at different levels in the brain, abnormal neuroplasticity, and altered sensory perception. Epidemiologically, there is higher risk for those musicians who play instruments requiring maximal fine-motor skills, such as piano, but the condition also occurs in brass players, double-reed players, and singers. For instruments where workload differs across hands, focal dystonia appears more often in the more intensely-used hand—the right hand in guitarists and lutenists. Preliminary findings also suggest a genetic contribution to focal task-specific dystonia with phenotypic variations including musicians’ dystonia. Treatment options include pharmacological interventions, such as trihexyphenidyl or botulinum toxin-A, as well as retraining programs and ergonomic changes in the instrument. Only a minority of musicians, however, return to fully-normal motor control using the currently available therapies. The non-optimality of current therapies—combined with the expectation that identifying the genes, genetic variations, and receptors that are involved in the condition may lead to new, more-effective therapies targeting those receptors in the nervous system—are what drives the recent genomics-based research in this area.

A t the Glasgow Royal Infirmary’s Department of Physiotherapy, eight musicians recently volunteered to take part in a retraining protocol and were studied by Patrice Berque and collaborators. Intensive ‘constraint-induced therapy’ and motor control retraining at slow speed were the interventions Berque examined. They made video recordings of the subjects playing. They measured ‘Frequency of Abnormal Movements’ scale (FAM), the change in metronome speed achieved during motor control retraining, plus two other dystonia evaluation scales. Over a 12-month period, the FAM scale scores showed statistically and clinically significant decrease in the number of abnormal movements per second of instrumental playing. Statistically, significant changes did not appear until about 8 months of therapy. Berque’s results suggest that a combination of constraint-induced therapy and specific motor control retraining may be a successful strategy for the treatment of musicians’ focal dystonia, and suggest that many months may elapse before significant progress occurs.

I n Cheng’s series, three people were found to have the delGAG deletion in the TOR1A (DYT1) gene, and two patients were found to have polymorphisms in the THAP1 gene (224A>T, 449A>C). The overall mutation frequency was 4.5% in Cheng’s patients, with TOR1A mutations found in 2.7% and THAP1 mutations found in 1.8%. No mutations were detected in the control population of normal Chinese. The significance with respect to musicians’ dystonia is not addressed by Cheng, but, by implication, we may anticipate that the genomic epidemiology of musicians’ dystonia may be subject to racial/ethnic variations in much the same manner as the genomic epidemiology of other forms of dystonia varies by race and ethnic ancestry.







Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Chamber Music-Induced Chills

 King’s College, Cambridge
L ast night I attended the candle-lit evensong choral services at Kings’ College Chapel. The 28-voice boys’ choir sang the service.

A t various moments, chills went up and down my spine, listening to the organ and the beautiful voices reverberate through the large sanctuary. “Why does the body do this?” I wondered. Go to PubMed and have a look!

C hills seem to be related to distinct musical structures and the “reward” system in the brain, including parts of the ventral striatum, the midbrain, the amygdala, the orbitofrontal cortex, and the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. Considerable research has recently been published on “chills”—as “leading indicator” correlates of emotional “rewards” that the brain is just now processing and propagating to other parts of the body, and as near-term “trailing indicators” of individual cognitive and emotional peaks just-past. Phenotypic measurements of physiological arousal (skin conductance response, heart rate, heart rate variability, etc.) consistently show peaks during chill episodes. Replication of the original studies have confirmed that chills are a reliable marker of emotional peaks that are induced by structures in music, that are temporally associated with self-reported subjective feelings with physiological arousal.

F or example, Oliver Grewe, Eckart Altenmüller, Reinhard Kopiez, Frederick Nagel, and others at the Institut für Musikphysiologie und Musikmedizin in the Hochschule für Musik, Theater und Medien, Hannover, find that people already familiar with the music are more likely to feel shivers up their spines at characteristic, predictable moments:
  • At transitions from loud to quiet;
  • Upon the entry of a solo voice or instrument;
  • When two (or more) parts have harmonic contrasts, such as close-harmony with beat-frequency interference between the notes'/formants' spectra; and
  • When the music evokes memories of past experiences that were emotionally intense.
T he responses of people who are not already acquainted with a piece of music are, in general, weaker and less predictable.

I n terms of programming for chamber music presenters and ensembles, these findings may lend some support to the traditional precept of including at least one familiar work in each program.

A s listeners or performers, in terms of explaining why our reactions to a work on first hearing are sometimes less vivid or shivery than we would like or expect, the lesson seems to be “Wait awhile. Give it multiple hearings. Assimilate the piece over time, and see what it does to you later.”

A nd, as composers, there is probably no surprise in these findings. Devising chill-inducing structures and mechanisms to create and resolve dramatic tension is what you do and have always done. Understanding the neurophysiology of music-induced shivering and spine-tingling doesn’t provide you with any new tools beyond the ones you already comprehend and routinely use. The aesthetic decisions about when and how often to use them remain the same as always.

I f you’re interested in the recent research on music and shivering, have a look at these papers (links below) to read about various bits of the physiologic mechanisms of music-induced “chills,” such as are known so far.

 King’s College, Cambridge



Saturday, May 22, 2010

Lumbricals, Some Getting Stronger, Others Discouragingly Staying the Same

 Lumbrical muscles
G   reat strength is necessary in the fingers, yes, but it comes with playing, if one plays rightly—that is, musically. From the moment one senses that the finger must ‘sing’, it becomes stronger. That is quite a different matter from playing exercises or etudes merely for the sake of strengthening, and saying ‘I must exercise my fingers and make them strong.’ Such playing as this latter sort does not help at all.”
  —  Vladimir Horowitz.
M y guitarist-pianist friend and colleague at work comes and visits with me this week, says that for more than a month he’s been doing exercises to strengthen the lumbrical muscles in his hands. The left hand has been responding, but the right hand—especially the ring finger and pinky—has been staying the same or, paradoxically, might even be getting weaker.

H e worries about focal dystonia. (Jason Solomon of Georgia Guitar Quartet has an excellent article about that here.) He worries about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). I am not a neurologist, but I know enough to know when to go and hire one. I ask my friend about whether he has any numbness or difference in sensation among the fingers on the right hand, or between the right and left...

T he fact that my friend is a professional software developer/engineer who spends 70+ hours at a laptop keyboard each week is something the neurologist will need to know, as part of the evaluation—in addition to the heavy hours on guitar and piano. In other words, if what my friend is experiencing is some type of repetitive stress injury (RSI), then characterizing the various types and intensities of repetitive motions will be clinically important.

T he state-of-the-art of hand biomechanics and hand problems of musicians have been a recurring interest for me for some years, so, in response my friend’s immediate situation, I go online and scan the current medical journal literature, to see what, if anything, is new in the last year or two. For his benefit and maybe for your own, I gather some relevant things together in the list of links below.

W here exactly is the ‘carpal tunnel’? The carpal tunnel is the narrow space anatomically between the small carpal bones of the wrist and the ligament called the flexor retinaculum. Here’s how you can find it: Put your left index finger in the center of your right palm, then move the finger about two inches down your palm toward your arm, stopping when your finger approaches the edge of the fleshy part of your hand. Your finger now lies directly over the carpal tunnel. The carpal tunnel is the U-shaped depression with carpal bones below and on either side. The flexor retinaculum ligament stretches over the top of the ‘U’ to make a tunnel-like space. The cross-section of the tunnel is only a centimeter or so, and nine flexor tendons (two to each finger and one to the thumb) have to pass through that little tunnel. The space is so narrow that some of the tendons are bundled on top of each other instead of going side-by-side the way they do outside the tunnel.

B esides tendons, the median nerve also goes through the carpal tunnel. By contrast, the ulnar nerve does not run in the carpal tunnel. The median nerve supplies most of the palm, the thumb, the index finger, the middle finger, and part of the ring finger. The first and second lumbricals (i.e. the two that are most ‘lateral’ on the radial side; index and middle fingers) are innervated by the median nerve. The third and fourth lumbricals (i.e. the most medial two; middle, ring, and little fingers) are innervated by the deep branch of the ulnar nerve. So if what’s going on is actually CTS, then you might expect weakness predominantly in lumbricals and/or interosseous muscles serving the thumb or index finger or middle finger or maybe the middle fingerward side of the ring finger. And you might think ‘ulnar neuropathy’ if the ring finger and/or pinky are predominantly affected.

B ut, gee, knowledge of the neuroanatomy of peripheral nerves in your arm and wrist and hand only gets you part of the way toward figuring out what is going on. In part, this is because of the interconnections elsewhere, including the motor cortex in your brain. Besides clinical evaluation, electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests are usually needed to confirm the diagnosis.

T he lumbrical and interosseous muscles are important in several motions—including flexing and plucking, increasing and diminishing the ‘spread’ of the fingers, and extending/raising the fingers. The lumbricals are used during an ‘upstroke’ when you are writing with a pen or pencil. These are the muscles that make the fingers separate and spread out or, alternately, converge and come together. The lumbrical muscles, with the help of the interosseous muscles, simultaneously flex the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints while extending both interphalangeal (IP) joints. In bats and other animals, these muscles are the ones that enable them to spread the wings and grab the air at one instant and flex and draw them in a few tens of milliseconds later and let the air go. If a bat acquired a repetitive stress injury of its lumbricals, on both sides or one side different from the other, it wouldn’t have long to live. Same thing for a seal: you can’t swim and catch fish if your lumbricals are faltering. Serious musicians—people whose livelihood or soul depends on playing—worry about this, as intently as a seal or bat.

T he EDX testing for these conditions is steadily getting more sensitive and more precise. For example, Sheehan and coworkers (link below) studied people referred with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by measuring the ‘second lumbrical-interosseous distal motor latency difference’ (2LI-DML) as well as by other, more standard tests like ‘median-ulnar palmar velocity difference’. The referred cases included 74% who turned out to be CTS. Sheehan suggests that 2LI-DML, which is a more sensitive test than other nerve conduction velocity tests for detecting mild abnormalities, is useful as a screening test for latent CTS on the asymptomatic side.

M otor distal latency (MDL) differences between the median-thenar and ulnar-hypothenar (M-U) muscles and between the median-second lumbrical and ulnar-interossei muscles (2L-INT) have also recently been used to diagnose early or ‘mixed’ cases. After all, there is no law of Nature that says a person can’t have CTS and UNE or CTS and focal dystonia at the same time. In people in whom the conventional nerve conduction tests are so far ‘normal’ despite the symptoms they are having, the neurologist can measure both motor and sensory W-P conduction and in a large percentage of cases this can establish a diagnosis.

U lnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb. Compared to ‘ulnar neuropathy at the elbow’ (UNE), ulnar neuropathy at the wrist (UNW) is rarer and more difficult to localize with routine electrodiagnostic (EDX) tests. In terms of expectation-setting, it is reasonable to anticipate that it may take some time (and multiple visits) to establish an accurate diagnosis and decide on the right treatment plan. In general, these are not things that can be sorted out in a single, quick office visit.

T he important thing—if you are having symptoms like the ones my guitarist friend is having—is to get yourself examined by a neurologist who is experienced in problems of performing artists and who has the equipment and training to perform the newer EDX tests that are available. You can search for practitioners who are diplomates of the American Board of Electrodiagnostic Medicine here. I regret that I don’t know what comparable search resources there may be for consultants having EDX professional certifications in other countries.





Friday, July 10, 2009

Music Lessons and Paroxysmal Mirth

 Umbrellasmile, ©2009 Gary Peterson, Fine Art America
H    vis du har sans for humor, så ved du, hvor godt det er for dit humør og dermed for din afslapning og din musikalsk kunstfærdighed.”

[If you have a sense of humor, then you must know how good it is for your mood and [therefore, or secondarily—] for your relaxedness and musicianship.]
  —  Thomas Raab, Dansk Selskab for Medicinsk Humor.
M y violin teacher, Chiyao "Jackie" Lee, put his fingers on my jaw while I was playing in my lesson with him on Monday night. Immediately that revealed that the muscles contracting there were creating needless, unproductive tension that interfered with the music by imparting that tension to other parts of my body.

T he revelation was so surprising that it made me laugh out loud... a spontaneous giggle from me at this little discovery, hitting me like a lightning-bolt. It’s like a “paroxysm”—instantaneous and uncontrollable: laughing as a kind of a “nano-seizure”.

L ater on in the lesson Jackie puts his hand on my bowtip as I am bowing. Instantly this reveals another fault in the balance of my bow… a fault that’s so delightful to figure out—and so shatteringly obvious in the way that he has revealed it—that this event caused yet another hearty laugh to bubble up inside me!

Y ears ago, Susanne Langer wrote that when it comes to learning instrumental technique, children have a great advantage. Children read “vague and multiple sorts of meaning into pure visual and auditory forms... a fertile openness that enhances intuition, since a child’s mind grasps analogies that a riper experience [of an adult] would reject as absurd.” (p. 110) What I am finding, learning violin as an adult, is a frequent kind of surprise—surprises full of humor that’s directed at my own body, at my own persona.

I n other words, each instrument, including the violin, has a ‘user interface’ (UI). It has a Heideggerian ‘toolness’ or ‘Verstehen’ that has evolved over the centuries to become what it is today—including K-bows and all sorts of other things.

B ut not only the instruments (in my current situation, a ‘composite’ of “violin box + strings + bowstick + bowhair”, or “keyboard + strings + soundboard + pedals”, or “flute body + headjoint”, or “trumpet + mouthpiece”) have UIs. I myself have a UI. My body—has a UI of its own! And sometimes it’s uncooperative. Or let’s just say it is “irregularly irregular” in its cooperativeness. And the learning process precipitates lots of instances where the instrument UI and the body UI collide. One of them balks at what the other is expecting/demanding.

T hen my teacher identifies this “instrument-student corporeal interface conflict” and, by the “mere” act of doing so, makes the UI gremlins vanish (at least temporarily…). That vanishing is so surprising that it is, to me, funny as hell. Makes me laugh, launches these tiny seizures of chuckling.

S ituationally-evoked ‘petit mal status gelasticus’, 50-cent physician phrase.

A nd then, “post-ictally”, when I recover from the chuckling I can continue playing and learning. Jackie is very patient with me. He is extremely perceptive, a wonderful teacher who is capable I think of helping (and surprising) any student at any level—a natural-born educator and one who clearly loves what he is doing.

I  wonder whether his incisive teaching causes ‘status gelasticus’ in other of his adult students…

I t is possible to formulate some features common to all types of humor, including ones involving the experience of something that is paroxysmally surprising, a “peek-a-boo” surprise like what Jackie causes when I have a lesson with him. And, although an overall theory of humor is still lacking, several recent cognitive theories have hinted that humor should be understood as a general biological process of navigating and acting in an ever-changing cognitive environment—which in turn involves discovering and recognizing repeated patterns in novel experiences, internalizing/learning them, and predicting them in the future. The humor comes when some other human being basically “re-wires” or “re-codes” your own body’s UI. You think you “own” your body and “understand” your body. Hogwash. You do not own your body. Your teacher has just re-wired you! That is immensely funny and surprising, to anyone who thinks like an adult. There is the giddiness of a child who has just learned to walk, or to tie her shoes. There is the giddiness of a stroke patient who in rehab is able now to move a limb that he never dreamed he would be able to move again. And there is my giddiness at music lessons.

T homas Raab and colleagues in Copenhagen have recently published papers on the theory of humor—the cognitive and physiological science of humor. You may like to have a look at their website (link below).

L aughter induces the release of beta-endorphins which bind µ3 opiate receptors in the endothelial lining of our blood vessels. Laughter also induces a direct release of nitric oxide (NO) in the circulation. Researchers actually publish scholarly papers on this!

B oth of these—the endorphins and the NO suddenly entering the bloodstream in generous amounts—cause the blood vessels to relax and dilate, and blood pressure promptly goes down (see Miller & Fry 2009). All of that is good for the musicality of whatever sounds we produce.

W hat else? Well, in 1987 Terry Winograd’s and Fernando Flores’s book (link below) was new. It has been my ‘10 Commandments’ reference as I have worked in my professional employment as a software developer over the past 23 years. They prominently feature analysis of computer UIs’ toolness in terms of Heidegger’s philosophical theories. My violin lesson with Jackie on Monday night caused me to pull Winograd & Flores off my bookshelf and re-read it, this time with an eye toward UIs of musical instruments.

M artin Heidegger in the 1930s wrote the bible, so to say, on ontology of toolness. He used the example of hammers, as archtypical of tools with good UIs. You don’t have to learn an abstraction to use it. Little kids when first encountering a hammer and without any parental teaching pick up hammer and begin using it, mostly in the intended hammerlike use-case. Heideggerian ‘toolness’, ‘immanence’—‘usability’, if you like—or the ordinary German word ‘verstehen’.

V erstehen basically means ‘thereness’, ‘openness to experience’, or ‘primordial comprehendability’. Those are the most adequate expressions to convey what it really means. The usual English dictionary translation of verstehen is wimpy, though. Usually some lame, card-boardy thing like ‘understanding’, way too cerebral. That’s not what it means. Not primeval enough. Verstehen is seeing a hook-like object and reflexively and instantaneously imagining that you could use it to catch fish, or seeing a sharp-edged object and imagining without any internal discourse or deliberation that “I could kill and eat food with that”. Or seeing a Google search UI or a good videogame UI and knowing immediately how to interact with it to get a good, valuable, winning result.

O r, for me, feeling the big muscles of my body, plus and arm and right hand, propelling bow with a tension-free, childlike, immanent bowhold—to produce an aesthetically commendable note. Preferrably lots of them, strung together into an aesthetically commendable performance.

B elow are links to my favorite books on the topic of UIs and ‘toolness’, mirthful and otherwise. The value and relevance of Heidegger’s and La Tour’s writings on ‘verstehen’ and the ontology of instruments as being-in-the-world are, I think, underappreciated by musicians…

T aiwanese violist Jackie Lee (my teacher) is a recipient of top prize awards in the ICO Concerto Competition, the Cleveland Institute Concerto Competition, the Ekstrand Competition, the National Viola Competition of Taiwan, and the Taipei City Viola Competition. As an active chamber musician, Lee was a member of the Satori Quartet. Lee has appeared in concerts at the Alice Tully Hall, Harris Hall, Vilar Center, and Severance Hall. He has performed at many summer music festivals, including the Music Academy of the West, Audubon Quartet Seminar and the Takacs Quartet Seminar. Besides serving as a faculty member at the UMKC Academy of Music and Dance (a component of the UMKC Conservatory), Lee’s other teaching activities include the Youth Programs of the Aspen Festival, the Bravo Music Festival, the Kneisel Hall Music Festival and the Taiwan National Institute of Art Summer Chamber Music Academy. Lee received his Master degree in Viola Performance at the Cleveland Institute of Music. While studying there, he also received a degree in Audio Recording Engineering. He is currently a DMA candidate at the UMKC Conservatory of Music and Dance.





Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Progress in Treating Musicians’ Focal Dystonia: 2008 Update

Pianist with focal dystonia
I   have a young student (teenage) who is having progressively more problems with his left hand, with violin. I have heard of musician’s cramp in older people—Leon Fleisher and all that. But I have never heard of it happening in kids. Does it happen and, if so, how common is it? Is there anything new in terms of available options for treating it? Would switching to a different violin help? Would switching to a viola or cello help?”
  —  Anonymous, email to CMT, Beijing.
Joseph Jankovic, a Professor of Neurology at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston) with whom I am acquainted, has recently collaborated on dystonia research with colleagues in Beijing (link below). Because I do not (yet) read Chinese it is only through personal contacts or through publications that appear in English that I become aware of neurologists in China who are specializing in dystonia diagnosis and management. But it is clear that there are a number of Chinese medical centers where you (your student) might go and receive expert care for this condition.
I don’t have any strong advice on this topic (musicians’ focal dystonia). And I don’t have any first-hand experience in diagnosing/treating/managing the condition. But I will gather together below some up-to-date information about current research, plus some links that you may find helpful in seeking expert assistance. As to the part of your question concerning the epidemiology of focal dystonia and the incidence of dystonia in kids, here is a quote that pertains to the experience in the U.S. (Maybe figures like these prevail in other parts of the world but, to my knowledge, no detailed epidemiologic statistics have so far been published.)

A   s many as 1 in 200 (0.5%) [of professional] musicians may be affected during their career, and at performing arts medical centers 8% to 14% of musicians seeking medical attention are ultimately diagnosed with dystonia. Symptoms usually begin in the fourth decade of life, a period when performers are at the peak of their careers, and once present rarely remit.”
  —  Anna Conti, Seth Pullman, and Steven Frucht, The Neurological Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, October 2008.
Dystonia is a movement disorder that causes the muscles in the body to contract or spasm involuntarily. These muscle ccontractions force the body into twisting, repetitive movements, and abnormal postures.
  • Multiple parts of the body can be affected, or sometimes just one such as hands, arms, neck, face, eyes, or vocal cords;
  • Symptoms are usually chronic and progressive;
  • Varying degrees of disability and pain, from mild to severe, interfering with performing on your instrument;
  • Affected body parts specifically are ones that are intensively utilized in your performing—ones that are the focus of intense attention, cognitive effort, and repetitive rehearsal.
There is still no cure for focal dystonia. There is no single treatment or therapy that is appropriate for every person who has focal dystonia. Treatment may include oral medications or Botox® / Myoblock® injections or behavioral retuning/conditioning exercises or, more recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The more that research enables us to understand Torsin genes and other elements involved in the development of the condition, the likelier it is that more effective and specific therapies can be devised to treat dystonia.

Focal dystonia is a condition characterized by a loss in motor control of one or more body parts. A single muscle or group of muscles is involved: for example, muscles in the hand and forearm tense and tighten, with the result of making the hand (or part of it) curl. Musicians who have intensively practiced their instruments over a number of years are a group most affected by this condition; usually the diagnosis is made when the person is in her/his 20s to 40s. The reason is that focal dystonia generally arises with repetitive movement of the affected body part(s) over a significant period of time. The condition was long known as an ‘occupational hand cramp.’ It can easily be misdiagnosed as simple overuse or stress of the hand. Although it may not be obvious at symptomatic presentation, the level at which the problem is caused is not the hand (or other affected part), but the brain. If kids are intensively trained and accumulate a high level of repetitive movement history at a younger age, there is no biological reason why they would not experience dystonic symptoms at age 15 which, in earlier generations, might have been more usual at age 25 or 35.

Focal dystonia is almost certainly the most prevalent and the most disabling professional disorder in musicians. It decreases the technical level of performances. For many musicians, it ends their performing career. The musician is progressively unable to control the movement of the affected body part(s) when performing. Yes, there is meaningful life for musicians after focal dystonia, when dystonia treatments are unsuccessful. There are roles in music teaching/coaching, music theory, composing, conducting, recording and producing. There are roles as agents, presenters, and executives in government arts and NGO agencies. All sorts of things. But the mourning over the loss of what could have been is monumental. These are musicians—of all ages—whose gifts in other areas may be wonderful, but whose gifts as performers have been foreclosed upon by the misfortune of neurophysiology and genetics. The motivation to discover the underlying causes and discover better therapies is powerful!

The Chicago-based Dystonia Medical Research Foundation (DMRF) routinely issues research grants to investigators, as do other foundation and governmental granting agencies. Some are studying repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of focal dystonia (e.g., Drs. Victor Candia; Teresa Kimberley and others).

Musicians With Dystonia [founded under the auspices of the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation (DMRF) in 2000 by professional French Horn player Glen Estrin and Steven Frucht, a neurologist at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York] also works to encourage and sponsor original research concerning causes and treatments for focal dystonia. The group is dedicated to serving the special needs of musicians affected by focal dystonia, particularly hand and embouchure dystonias. As division of DMRF, the Musicians with Dystonia group supports innovative research in all populations of affected musicians, regardless of age.

The Musicians Medical Advisory Committee of the DMRF encourages grant applications from researchers addressing physician education programs (so that new innovations are made broadly available in practice, to the widest possible number of affected musicians), not just basic science or theoretical neuroscience studies.

Victor Candia is a fine example of a musician who is conducting practical applied research on dystonia. Victor was born in 1966 in Chile, and for 10+ years he taught classical guitar at music conservatories in Germany. In 1991, he developed severe focal dystonia of his left hand, which ended his career as a professional guitarist. He then studied Psychology at the University of Konstanz, Germany, from 1992 to 2000, where he designed and conducted research studies in musicians with dystonia. After completing his doctoral degree, in 2004 he joined the faculty at the Collegium Helveticum of the University and ETH Zürich, where he conducts research on neurophysiology of emotions, brain plasticity, and focal dystonia. Candia and his colleagues have studied treating focal dystonia with ‘sensorimotor retuning’ (SMR) and other methods, examining the efficacy of those techniques in performing artists. Remodeling cortical networks through sensory-motor retuning (SMR) have achieved long-term reduction in the symptoms of focal hand dystonia. The SMR treatments must be continued over time for the benefits to be sustained—but this finding is itself a very important practical result of Victor’s work. It is not only a matter of ‘what’ to do, but also a matter of ‘how’ and ‘how long’ to do it.

Recent fMRI magnetoencephalographic studies confirm that SMR modifies the ‘representational cortex’ that the brain has for the fingers and the fingers’ relations to each otehr, whereby the representation of the affected hand is reorganized so that it more closely resembles the organization of the non-affected side. Candia and others also observe differences in abnormal ‘tactile acuity’ between patients who have musicians’ dystonia and those with writers’ cramp. Using two-point finger discrimination, Candia’s group has found that dystonic musicians show a dramatic, quantitatively/statistically significant perceptual asymmetry between their hands, while writers’ cramp patients do not. To further evaluate the occurrence of collateral disturbances in focal dystonia, they assessed the clinical histories of more than 100 affected musicians. Solid results. Not anecdotes and qualitative ‘case reports’. Not soft conjectures. Solid, quantitative, actionable answers!

An important finding from Candia’s recent published studies was that dystonic musicians who play a similar first and second instruments consistently report a continuous worsening of their symptoms. In addition, collateral disturbances appeared with a shorter delay when more than one instrument was played. So for the Beijing teacher whose question was the reason for this CMT post, the answer is that substituting viola or cello would probably not yield lasting relief and may, in fact, make the process more rapid or severe. Taken together, the evidence suggests:
  1. that neurological dysfunction can be substantially reversed by context-specific re-training of the affected part(s) [great news!];
  2. reversal of dysfunction may be a slow process over many weeks or months [our hopes and fears, realistically calibrated!];
  3. specific symptomatic and etiological differences among various forms of focal hand dystonia might result from different behavioral experiences and how and where those experiences are stored represented in the brain [helpful for diagnosticians and teachers!]; and
  4. the spread of dystonic symptoms can in many instances be prevented by avoiding any training exercises that entail movement patterns that are similar to the main affected task, and by establishing ‘quotas’ on practice/rehearsal (limiting the amount of performance task-associated movements per day).
Karin Rosenkranz and colleauges in London at Sobell Dept of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders the Institute of Neurology at UCL are also iconic examples of pragmatic research on dystonia. They have recently been working on sensorimotor retuning treatments for focal dystonia. The sensorimotor organization (SMO) of the motor hand area is abnormal in focal hand dystonia and appears to contribute directly to symptoms. In healthy musicians SMO is changed by training with spatial ‘proprioceptive’ stimulation. They tested whether similar interventions reverse the abnormal SMO in musicians’ dystonia and writers’ cramp, anticipating possibly developing them for improved therapies. In six non-musicians, six professional musicians, six patients with musicians’ dystonia, and six patients with writer’s cramp, SMO was explored by measuring changes in ‘short-interval-intracortical-inhibition’ (SICI) during short periods of mechanical hand muscle vibration before and after two training types:
  • AttVIB, involving attention to 15 minutes vibration of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB); and
  • AttIndex, involving attention to neural stimulation of the index finger.
In normal, non-dystonic non-musicians, they found that baseline SMO is ‘spatially differentiated’ in the brain. That is, they found that SICI is reduced in projections to the vibrated parts, but enhanced in projections to the non-vibrated muscles. AttVIB increased and AttIndex reduced the effect of subsequent APB-vibration on SMO.

In healthy, non-dystonic musicians, the baseline SMO is not differentiated as much. AttVIB restored a more differentiated SMO pattern, while AttIndex diminished the effect of APB vibration. But in focal hand dystonia, they found that SMO is completely spatially de-differentiated. AttVIB tended to restore a more differential SMO in musicians’ dystonia (but not in writer’s cramp), while AttIndex failed to induce any changes in both groups.

W  hether the vibration retuning intervention is effective or not apparently depends on the musician’s prior sensorimotor organization (SMO). In musicians’ focal hand dystonia, it’s possible to retrain an abnormal SMO toward a more spatially differentiated pattern.

Steven Frucht and colleagues at The Neurological Institute of New York at Columbia University Medical Center are another group active in conducting research to identify the neurophysiology and genomics of focal dystonia and to evaluate new practical treatments. Have a look at their website (and links below) to see what’s new in their efforts, and to see whether any of the clinical trials that they are conducting may be relevant to you or to your student.

Neuronetics rTMS clinical trials centers, U.S., 2008
The Dystonia Medical Research Foundation has a number of DVDs and videos that you may find useful. They also have a nice Treatments page that provides information on the approaches that are available right now (both medical and non-medical ones), plus a referral service to help you find a neurologist in your area who is experienced in managing focal dystonia in musicians.

Check out DMRF’s Musicians with Dystonia webpage.

Besides recent advances in sensorimotor retuning and other behavioral interventiosn, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are promising, novel, noninvasive cortical stimulation methods for treatment of dystonia and other movement disorders. They avoid surgical risks and provide advantages in terms of targeting specific neural circuits modulating action of the affected muscles. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered at 0.5 Hz to 5 Hz repetitions and suprathreshold (e.g., ~2 Tesla) intensity produces a progressive facilitation of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude that outlasts the end of stimulation. This effect is related to a short-term enhancement of cortical excitatory interneurons in the brain.

In patients with upper limb dystonia there’s an characteristic abnormal recovery from MEP facilitation after ‘supra-threshold’ 5 Hz rTMS, which suggests an abnormal pattern of short-term cortical plasticity in the brain. The abnormal recovery pattern is diagnostic (‘pathognomonic’) of focal dystonia—so if there’s any diagnostic uncertainty prior to the procedure, it may be resolved beyond a shadow of any doubt after the procedure. rTMS is an outpatient procedure, and each treatment takes only about 30 minutes. But it’s not a particularly pleasant procedure. Not as invasive as ECT, to be sure; but not without discomfort. Depending on the intensity of the frequency and the coil-type that is used to apply the magnetic field, many patients do experience headaches and other unpleasant sensations during and after rTMS. The most critical clinical concern is the risk of seizures during rTMS. Treatable, surely, but not a trivial adverse event if it materializes for you!

After rTMS treatment, the movement-enhancing effects of rTMS in focal dystonia patients last longer than in normal non-dystonic people. rTMS may only need to be repeated once a week or once every two weeks. Multiple mechanisms likely contribute to the clinical effects of rTMS in movement disorders, including normalization of cortical excitability, rebalancing the brain’s distributed neural network activity, and inducing dopamine release in the brain. It remains unclear how to individually adjust rTMS variables for the most beneficial effects on symptoms of dystonia. Nonetheless, the noninvasive nature of rTMS, the minimal side effects it has for most people, the positive effects it has demonstrated in preliminary clinical studies, and the growing evidence for mechanisms of action all make rTMS attractive for ongoing research investigation and for your consideration in the future, for yourself or for your students.

Neuronetics NeuroStar® rTMS device
There is already considerable published evidence that rTMS is clinically effective, and rTMS is now being used in depression and other neurological conditions. But rTMS is slow in achieving recognition and regulatory approval as an accepted option in the therapeutic armamentarium for use in dystonia. Its beneficial effects are admittedly of short duration (days) and inconstant from one patient to the next and within any particular patient over time. These factors mean that presently in many countries rTMS is not ‘covered’ or reimbursed by insurers or health systems.

In the U.S., rTMS devices are still investigational with regard to dystonia treatment—only available to patients enrolled in clinical trials. Some rTMS devices are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for stimulation of peripheral nerves but can be used off-label by physicians to treat other neurological disorders not approved by FDA. But insurers won't pay for rTMS treatments when they are given off-label. So in the U.S. and in other countries, generally patients who want to try rTMS for their dystonia will have to pay for the treatments out-of-pocket.

The same is also true for use of Botox/Myoblock treatments for dystonia in some countries. Until now, there has been inadequate control of the stimulation site. It is possible that the rTMS stimulation site could/should be varied on an individual basis. It seems logical to propose the use of fMRI functional imaging for such a purpose, but its use should be adapted to each individual patient’s symptoms and affected body part(s). Even after localizing the site by using fMRI or other measurments, the rTMS coil has to be placed accurately by the clinician. Procedural consistency is a major issue in producing decisive, actionable research results and journal publications that will convince payors and regulators. Stimulation protocols are currently defined by several parameters: the frequency of the rTMS stimulation (>5 Hz) or inhibition (<1 Hz), and the intensity and the number of stimuli influencing the amplitude and duration of the effect. Unfortunately, the effect has so far been variable in each patient. Paradoxical (non-beneficial and adverse) reactions have been observed in more than 15% of normal individuals treated with rTMS. In other words, don’t undertake rTMS lightly. It is entirely possible that, for you, it might make you worse than you are right now.

rTMS coil and mannequin
Medications used to treat dystonia are a brute-force, nonspecific ‘systemic’ option. Sledge hammer precision. Not ideal, but not to be ignored, particularly in extreme situations. Meds include:
  • Trihexyphenidyl
  • Benztropine
  • Anticonvulsants
  • Procyclidine
  • Muscle relaxants
  • Levodopa/carbidopa
  • Bromocriptine
Botox® or Myoblock® injected directly into the muscles affected by dystonia weakens the muscle. This may help improve symptoms of dystonia for 3 to 4 months, but the relief is in general not permanent. And the weakening may itself prevent concert-level performance, Leon Fleisher’s good results notwithstanding. The botulinum toxin preparation used in China is mostly CBTX-A® (Lanzhou Biological Products Institute, 888 Yanchanglu, Lanzhou, Gansu Lanzhou, Gansu 730046, China; Phone : ‎+86 931 8340311), which is a little less potent than Botox® (and therefore may need to be repeated more often) but much less expensive (Allergan Inc.)

Trihexyphenidyl and other anti-cholinergics that are sometimes used to treat dystonia may produce chorea or other movement disorders that are more severe than the dystonia. So it is best to be cautious. None of these options is ‘benign’; all of them have significant limitations/risks as well as strengths/benefits. You need to consult a neurologist who is expert in the treatment of dystonia in musicians to make a proper choice. [Besides the links above for the Beijing-based CMT commenter/emailer] the links below may help you to find such a person near your location, who can help you review the options and decide.

Meds that themselves sometimes cause dystonia as a side-effect include the following:
  • Levodopa/carbidopa
  • Bromocriptine
  • Antipsychotic meds
  • Metoclopramide
  • Dilantin
  • Calcium channel blockers
  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
  • Ergotamines
  • Antihistamines (esp. cetirizine Zyrtec)
Focal dystonia has a prevalence of 29.5 per 100,000 people in the general population as reported by Nutt and coworkers at the Mayo Clinic some years ago, but, then and now, dystonia often goes un-diagnosed or mis-diagnosed. Almost certainly the 1-in-200 remark at the top in the blockquote from Anna Conti, Seth Pullman, and Steven Frucht is the relevant figure with regard to musicians—both professional ones and serious amateurs. Curiously childhood- and adolescent-onset primary dystonia is more common in Jews of Eastern European or Ashkenazi ancestry, compared to the general population. Possibly there are genetic factors that will be found to be important in dystonia in Chinese and other populations. Although most cases of focal dystonia in musicians come to the attention of neurologists when the patients are in their 20s or later, it is more and more common to see the condition diagnosed at earlier ages. Possibly this is a correlate of the trend in many countries toward larger numbers of kids receiving intensive training as elite-level musicians, especially in China. But to-date there are no journal articles or other research publications that report on this.

Thank you very much for the question. I hope this post is useful to you. Please feel free to comment or email me again on this topic, or let other CMT readers know what results you have had with interventions you try.