Showing posts with label performing arts medicine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label performing arts medicine. Show all posts

Monday, February 9, 2009

‘Tis the Season for Violin Hickeys

 Violin hickey
A    common skin condition experienced by violinists and violists at both the amateur and professional level is ‘fiddlers’ neck’, an area of hyperpigmentation and lichenification on the left side of the neck, below the angle of the jaw. Erythema, scaling, cyst formation, scarring, and inflammatory papules or pustules [of the skin that experiences prolonged contact with the instrument/chinrest] also occur. Focal neck edema can lead to concerns about the cosmetic appearance ... These skin changes have been attributed to a number of factors, including poor technique leading to increased pressure of the instrument on the skin of the neck, increased friction between the instrument and the skin caused by a poorly fitting chin rest or an inadequate shoulder rest, poor hygiene, and even the size of the instrument. Viola players may be more prone to have fiddlers’ neck than violinists because the instrument is larger and heavier [and imposes proportionately larger biomechanical stresses on the cervical skin, that augment the contact intensity under which contact dermatitis arises and that impair skin integrity and/or compromise the skin’s compensatory repair processes in proportion to the greater pressure of skin contact associated with the heavier instrument—leading to greater prevalence of the problem among violists and to greater severity and chronicity of the lesions in violists who experience the condition, compared to violinists who have similar weekly contact time-exposure profiles with their instruments].”
  —  Liu S, Hayden G. Maladies in musicians. Southern Med J 2002; 95:727-34. (citing Peachey & Matthews 1978).
 Valentine
S everal emails to CMT recently have asked about ‘fiddlers’ neck’—inquiring about whether there are any new treatments for it, or asking about the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of specific skin-care products.

B arrier cream for allergic contact dermatitis doesn’t really help—it’s not effective for mechanical dermatitis like what happens with violin and viola. Emollient creams and emollient soap substitutes are pretty effective in managing the condition, as are topical steroids and antibiotics if the area becomes infected.

 Violin hickey
H ere are things that actually work, for most people:

  • Minimize washing of the affected skin—Frequent or prolonged water exposure actually dries out the skin and disrupts the barrier function of the epidermis.
  • Apply moisturizing lotion/cream on the affected skin—Frequent moisturization improves the barrier function of the skin. Avoid the use of moisturizers with perfumes since these may also act as irritants.
  • Apply topical steroid cream/lotion—Potent topical steroid (e.g., 0.2% to 1.0% hydrocortisone or equivalent) help to reduce inflammation.
  • Apply topical analgesics—Pramoxine or similar compounds—can relieve itching or irritation, which can in turn help to minimize the severity of continued mechanical trauma to the affected area.
 Violin hickey
O vertreatment dermatitis’ or ‘iatrogenic dermatitis’ is a form of secondary dermatitis that occurs when treatment for another skin disorder causes irritation. The case of someone in whom treatment of violin hickey with hydrocortisone causes worsening, rather than improvement, of the hickey, would be termed an iatrogenic secondary dermatitis complicating the primary violin contact dermatitis.

The information on this page is not intended as medical advice and is not meant to be a substitute for individual medical judgment by a physician or other medical healthcare professional. The aim is to provide information and help in suggesting considerations for preventive care. Some products, such as corticosteroids, should be used only after a medical examination and under the supervision of a doctor. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider for individualized advice on your health decisions.

 Violin hickey
 ic1805 valentine nebula, NASA photo (c) Matt Russell


Thursday, January 29, 2009

Singing & Dry Mouth: Things You Might Not Have Tried

 Mouth
M    y mouth gets incredibly dry when I sing. Are there any new things to try out there? A gel I tried once felt greasy in my mouth, so that was the end of that. And sprays I’ve tried only last about 10 minutes.”
  —  Anonymous email to CMT.
T he short duration of action you experienced with the sprays isn’t unusual. You need to remember that any extraneous material in the mouth tends to induce reflexive/habitual motions (of tongue, etc.) to remove it and clear it out. Products that would have a longer duration of action for regular people just sitting around and not talking or singing may not last so long for you during a vocal performance. Years ago, I used to take care of cancer patients, both immediately after radiation treatment and later in palliative care, so I do know something about the strengths and limitations of the ‘artificial saliva’ products that are available.

S ubjective dry mouth sensation is known as xerostomia. But when sialometry (performed by a physician immunologist or laryngologist) objectively demonstrates a saliva flow rate of under 0.2 mL/min (resting salivation rate) and under 0.7 mL/min (stimulated salivation rate), the fancy medical terms ‘hyposialia’, ‘sialopenia’, or ‘salivary hyposecretion’ are used—basically, saliva production less than 500 mL of saliva a day, against ‘normal’ losses of saliva to (mouth-open breathing-related) evaporation and ordinary swallowing of saliva: a deficient production compared to normal losses.

L ow saliva not what the question above was about, though. The question has mostly to do with increased evaporative losses associated with large minute-wise airflow for singing, against ‘normal’ saliva flow rates that are unable to keep up with the rate of loss. In some cases, the dry mouth may be exacerbated by stage fright or allergies or medications you might be taking or a health condition that causes the mouth to be dry. But, for many singers, it’s just the mismatch between the (modest-but-normal) rate of saliva production and the (singing-accelerated) rate of saliva loss.

T he artificial saliva material may not only migrate down the throat into the esophagus, but also (in small amounts) into the larynx. So with regard to singing, please be sure to try out whatever solution you are planning to use in advance—in rehearsals long before any public performance. You don’t want to do anything radically new or un-tested on-stage.

D ry mouth is treated with liquid or gel artificial saliva solutions that are designed so that they will be retained on the mucosal surfaces for a period of some tens of minutes at least, to provide lubrication. These solutions contain bioadhesive polymers (chains that range from a few thousand Daltons molecular weight up to about 100 KDa MW), often sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). Some newer ones have an oxygenated glycerine tri-ester (TGO) active ingredient. Most of these have a rather slippery/sticky ‘mouth-feel’, but are well worth a try.

G ellan gum and alginate also both form mucoadherent gels, albeit by a different mechanism (ionic strength of moisture at physiologic mucosal surface) than the others. There are a few over-the-counter products that have these as their active ingredients.

G el-based artificial saliva products have traditionally been more effective and last longer than ‘spray’ type artificial salivas. This has been extensively studied in palliative-care patients, especially terminal cancer. But there are some mucin-mimicking artificial saliva products that have been introduced just in the last two years that have performed well in clinical trials.

P oloxamers in 2% w/v to 5% w/v solutions are liquids at room temperature but gel at body temperature, once they are applied inside the mouth.

T he polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer within an anionic polymer solution (Oasis®) enables higher concentrations of mucoadhesive polymer than older products achieve. These PVP copolymer films stay ‘stuck’ to the mouth tissues for longer, while at the same time giving improved mouth-feel due to reduced slippery/sticky mouth-feel, compared to carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-based artificial saliva products. I have tried Oasis® and think it works very well.

 Polyoxamer F-127 N ote that the Oasis® spray does not have poloxamer in it. You can use as required, up to a maximum of 60 sprays per day. Each application of the Oasis® mouthwash lasts about 2 hours; each application of the Oasis® spray keeps your mouth feeling moist for, at most, 60 min or so. The Oasis® mouthwash would probably work better for a singer performing longer concerts. (Supposedly, Mariah Carey uses MouthKote® spray…)

T alk to your retail pharmacist. Those with training in clinical pharmacy are well prepared to advise you on the pros and cons of the various products. Some pharmacies don’t stock these products, or have a small selection since it’s a low-volume type of item, used by relatively few patients. So you may have to look for mail-order options. The hyperlinks embedded in this CMT post will give you a few options you can check out.

O r talk to your dentist. With the exception of palliative medicine physicians, oncologist physicians, ENT physicians, immunologist physicians and some gerontologists, most physicians have little experience with dry mouth and are not expert in managing it. Dentists are, in general, very knowledgeable about OTC and prescription approaches to treating dry mouth. In the U.S., artificial saliva products are regulated by FDA CDRH as Class II 510(k) dental medical devices, not as drugs.

S ome products (like Salivese®, Glandosane®, BioXtra®, and Salivix®) are only licensed for dry mouth due to radiotherapy or Sjogren’s Syndrome and require a prescription. You don’t have to have one of those ‘on-label’ conditions to get a prescription for these. A physician or dentist could legally write a prescription for you (‘off-label’). But you would have to explain to them what your performing activity entails, and why you need a powerful artificial saliva—get them to understand why other things have not been adequately effective for you and why you therefore would like to try a prescription for one of these ‘heavier-duty’ artificial saliva products.




Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Progress in Treating Musicians’ Focal Dystonia: 2008 Update

Pianist with focal dystonia
I   have a young student (teenage) who is having progressively more problems with his left hand, with violin. I have heard of musician’s cramp in older people—Leon Fleisher and all that. But I have never heard of it happening in kids. Does it happen and, if so, how common is it? Is there anything new in terms of available options for treating it? Would switching to a different violin help? Would switching to a viola or cello help?”
  —  Anonymous, email to CMT, Beijing.
Joseph Jankovic, a Professor of Neurology at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston) with whom I am acquainted, has recently collaborated on dystonia research with colleagues in Beijing (link below). Because I do not (yet) read Chinese it is only through personal contacts or through publications that appear in English that I become aware of neurologists in China who are specializing in dystonia diagnosis and management. But it is clear that there are a number of Chinese medical centers where you (your student) might go and receive expert care for this condition.
I don’t have any strong advice on this topic (musicians’ focal dystonia). And I don’t have any first-hand experience in diagnosing/treating/managing the condition. But I will gather together below some up-to-date information about current research, plus some links that you may find helpful in seeking expert assistance. As to the part of your question concerning the epidemiology of focal dystonia and the incidence of dystonia in kids, here is a quote that pertains to the experience in the U.S. (Maybe figures like these prevail in other parts of the world but, to my knowledge, no detailed epidemiologic statistics have so far been published.)

A   s many as 1 in 200 (0.5%) [of professional] musicians may be affected during their career, and at performing arts medical centers 8% to 14% of musicians seeking medical attention are ultimately diagnosed with dystonia. Symptoms usually begin in the fourth decade of life, a period when performers are at the peak of their careers, and once present rarely remit.”
  —  Anna Conti, Seth Pullman, and Steven Frucht, The Neurological Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, October 2008.
Dystonia is a movement disorder that causes the muscles in the body to contract or spasm involuntarily. These muscle ccontractions force the body into twisting, repetitive movements, and abnormal postures.
  • Multiple parts of the body can be affected, or sometimes just one such as hands, arms, neck, face, eyes, or vocal cords;
  • Symptoms are usually chronic and progressive;
  • Varying degrees of disability and pain, from mild to severe, interfering with performing on your instrument;
  • Affected body parts specifically are ones that are intensively utilized in your performing—ones that are the focus of intense attention, cognitive effort, and repetitive rehearsal.
There is still no cure for focal dystonia. There is no single treatment or therapy that is appropriate for every person who has focal dystonia. Treatment may include oral medications or Botox® / Myoblock® injections or behavioral retuning/conditioning exercises or, more recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The more that research enables us to understand Torsin genes and other elements involved in the development of the condition, the likelier it is that more effective and specific therapies can be devised to treat dystonia.

Focal dystonia is a condition characterized by a loss in motor control of one or more body parts. A single muscle or group of muscles is involved: for example, muscles in the hand and forearm tense and tighten, with the result of making the hand (or part of it) curl. Musicians who have intensively practiced their instruments over a number of years are a group most affected by this condition; usually the diagnosis is made when the person is in her/his 20s to 40s. The reason is that focal dystonia generally arises with repetitive movement of the affected body part(s) over a significant period of time. The condition was long known as an ‘occupational hand cramp.’ It can easily be misdiagnosed as simple overuse or stress of the hand. Although it may not be obvious at symptomatic presentation, the level at which the problem is caused is not the hand (or other affected part), but the brain. If kids are intensively trained and accumulate a high level of repetitive movement history at a younger age, there is no biological reason why they would not experience dystonic symptoms at age 15 which, in earlier generations, might have been more usual at age 25 or 35.

Focal dystonia is almost certainly the most prevalent and the most disabling professional disorder in musicians. It decreases the technical level of performances. For many musicians, it ends their performing career. The musician is progressively unable to control the movement of the affected body part(s) when performing. Yes, there is meaningful life for musicians after focal dystonia, when dystonia treatments are unsuccessful. There are roles in music teaching/coaching, music theory, composing, conducting, recording and producing. There are roles as agents, presenters, and executives in government arts and NGO agencies. All sorts of things. But the mourning over the loss of what could have been is monumental. These are musicians—of all ages—whose gifts in other areas may be wonderful, but whose gifts as performers have been foreclosed upon by the misfortune of neurophysiology and genetics. The motivation to discover the underlying causes and discover better therapies is powerful!

The Chicago-based Dystonia Medical Research Foundation (DMRF) routinely issues research grants to investigators, as do other foundation and governmental granting agencies. Some are studying repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of focal dystonia (e.g., Drs. Victor Candia; Teresa Kimberley and others).

Musicians With Dystonia [founded under the auspices of the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation (DMRF) in 2000 by professional French Horn player Glen Estrin and Steven Frucht, a neurologist at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in New York] also works to encourage and sponsor original research concerning causes and treatments for focal dystonia. The group is dedicated to serving the special needs of musicians affected by focal dystonia, particularly hand and embouchure dystonias. As division of DMRF, the Musicians with Dystonia group supports innovative research in all populations of affected musicians, regardless of age.

The Musicians Medical Advisory Committee of the DMRF encourages grant applications from researchers addressing physician education programs (so that new innovations are made broadly available in practice, to the widest possible number of affected musicians), not just basic science or theoretical neuroscience studies.

Victor Candia is a fine example of a musician who is conducting practical applied research on dystonia. Victor was born in 1966 in Chile, and for 10+ years he taught classical guitar at music conservatories in Germany. In 1991, he developed severe focal dystonia of his left hand, which ended his career as a professional guitarist. He then studied Psychology at the University of Konstanz, Germany, from 1992 to 2000, where he designed and conducted research studies in musicians with dystonia. After completing his doctoral degree, in 2004 he joined the faculty at the Collegium Helveticum of the University and ETH Zürich, where he conducts research on neurophysiology of emotions, brain plasticity, and focal dystonia. Candia and his colleagues have studied treating focal dystonia with ‘sensorimotor retuning’ (SMR) and other methods, examining the efficacy of those techniques in performing artists. Remodeling cortical networks through sensory-motor retuning (SMR) have achieved long-term reduction in the symptoms of focal hand dystonia. The SMR treatments must be continued over time for the benefits to be sustained—but this finding is itself a very important practical result of Victor’s work. It is not only a matter of ‘what’ to do, but also a matter of ‘how’ and ‘how long’ to do it.

Recent fMRI magnetoencephalographic studies confirm that SMR modifies the ‘representational cortex’ that the brain has for the fingers and the fingers’ relations to each otehr, whereby the representation of the affected hand is reorganized so that it more closely resembles the organization of the non-affected side. Candia and others also observe differences in abnormal ‘tactile acuity’ between patients who have musicians’ dystonia and those with writers’ cramp. Using two-point finger discrimination, Candia’s group has found that dystonic musicians show a dramatic, quantitatively/statistically significant perceptual asymmetry between their hands, while writers’ cramp patients do not. To further evaluate the occurrence of collateral disturbances in focal dystonia, they assessed the clinical histories of more than 100 affected musicians. Solid results. Not anecdotes and qualitative ‘case reports’. Not soft conjectures. Solid, quantitative, actionable answers!

An important finding from Candia’s recent published studies was that dystonic musicians who play a similar first and second instruments consistently report a continuous worsening of their symptoms. In addition, collateral disturbances appeared with a shorter delay when more than one instrument was played. So for the Beijing teacher whose question was the reason for this CMT post, the answer is that substituting viola or cello would probably not yield lasting relief and may, in fact, make the process more rapid or severe. Taken together, the evidence suggests:
  1. that neurological dysfunction can be substantially reversed by context-specific re-training of the affected part(s) [great news!];
  2. reversal of dysfunction may be a slow process over many weeks or months [our hopes and fears, realistically calibrated!];
  3. specific symptomatic and etiological differences among various forms of focal hand dystonia might result from different behavioral experiences and how and where those experiences are stored represented in the brain [helpful for diagnosticians and teachers!]; and
  4. the spread of dystonic symptoms can in many instances be prevented by avoiding any training exercises that entail movement patterns that are similar to the main affected task, and by establishing ‘quotas’ on practice/rehearsal (limiting the amount of performance task-associated movements per day).
Karin Rosenkranz and colleauges in London at Sobell Dept of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders the Institute of Neurology at UCL are also iconic examples of pragmatic research on dystonia. They have recently been working on sensorimotor retuning treatments for focal dystonia. The sensorimotor organization (SMO) of the motor hand area is abnormal in focal hand dystonia and appears to contribute directly to symptoms. In healthy musicians SMO is changed by training with spatial ‘proprioceptive’ stimulation. They tested whether similar interventions reverse the abnormal SMO in musicians’ dystonia and writers’ cramp, anticipating possibly developing them for improved therapies. In six non-musicians, six professional musicians, six patients with musicians’ dystonia, and six patients with writer’s cramp, SMO was explored by measuring changes in ‘short-interval-intracortical-inhibition’ (SICI) during short periods of mechanical hand muscle vibration before and after two training types:
  • AttVIB, involving attention to 15 minutes vibration of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB); and
  • AttIndex, involving attention to neural stimulation of the index finger.
In normal, non-dystonic non-musicians, they found that baseline SMO is ‘spatially differentiated’ in the brain. That is, they found that SICI is reduced in projections to the vibrated parts, but enhanced in projections to the non-vibrated muscles. AttVIB increased and AttIndex reduced the effect of subsequent APB-vibration on SMO.

In healthy, non-dystonic musicians, the baseline SMO is not differentiated as much. AttVIB restored a more differentiated SMO pattern, while AttIndex diminished the effect of APB vibration. But in focal hand dystonia, they found that SMO is completely spatially de-differentiated. AttVIB tended to restore a more differential SMO in musicians’ dystonia (but not in writer’s cramp), while AttIndex failed to induce any changes in both groups.

W  hether the vibration retuning intervention is effective or not apparently depends on the musician’s prior sensorimotor organization (SMO). In musicians’ focal hand dystonia, it’s possible to retrain an abnormal SMO toward a more spatially differentiated pattern.

Steven Frucht and colleagues at The Neurological Institute of New York at Columbia University Medical Center are another group active in conducting research to identify the neurophysiology and genomics of focal dystonia and to evaluate new practical treatments. Have a look at their website (and links below) to see what’s new in their efforts, and to see whether any of the clinical trials that they are conducting may be relevant to you or to your student.

Neuronetics rTMS clinical trials centers, U.S., 2008
The Dystonia Medical Research Foundation has a number of DVDs and videos that you may find useful. They also have a nice Treatments page that provides information on the approaches that are available right now (both medical and non-medical ones), plus a referral service to help you find a neurologist in your area who is experienced in managing focal dystonia in musicians.

Check out DMRF’s Musicians with Dystonia webpage.

Besides recent advances in sensorimotor retuning and other behavioral interventiosn, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are promising, novel, noninvasive cortical stimulation methods for treatment of dystonia and other movement disorders. They avoid surgical risks and provide advantages in terms of targeting specific neural circuits modulating action of the affected muscles. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered at 0.5 Hz to 5 Hz repetitions and suprathreshold (e.g., ~2 Tesla) intensity produces a progressive facilitation of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude that outlasts the end of stimulation. This effect is related to a short-term enhancement of cortical excitatory interneurons in the brain.

In patients with upper limb dystonia there’s an characteristic abnormal recovery from MEP facilitation after ‘supra-threshold’ 5 Hz rTMS, which suggests an abnormal pattern of short-term cortical plasticity in the brain. The abnormal recovery pattern is diagnostic (‘pathognomonic’) of focal dystonia—so if there’s any diagnostic uncertainty prior to the procedure, it may be resolved beyond a shadow of any doubt after the procedure. rTMS is an outpatient procedure, and each treatment takes only about 30 minutes. But it’s not a particularly pleasant procedure. Not as invasive as ECT, to be sure; but not without discomfort. Depending on the intensity of the frequency and the coil-type that is used to apply the magnetic field, many patients do experience headaches and other unpleasant sensations during and after rTMS. The most critical clinical concern is the risk of seizures during rTMS. Treatable, surely, but not a trivial adverse event if it materializes for you!

After rTMS treatment, the movement-enhancing effects of rTMS in focal dystonia patients last longer than in normal non-dystonic people. rTMS may only need to be repeated once a week or once every two weeks. Multiple mechanisms likely contribute to the clinical effects of rTMS in movement disorders, including normalization of cortical excitability, rebalancing the brain’s distributed neural network activity, and inducing dopamine release in the brain. It remains unclear how to individually adjust rTMS variables for the most beneficial effects on symptoms of dystonia. Nonetheless, the noninvasive nature of rTMS, the minimal side effects it has for most people, the positive effects it has demonstrated in preliminary clinical studies, and the growing evidence for mechanisms of action all make rTMS attractive for ongoing research investigation and for your consideration in the future, for yourself or for your students.

Neuronetics NeuroStar® rTMS device
There is already considerable published evidence that rTMS is clinically effective, and rTMS is now being used in depression and other neurological conditions. But rTMS is slow in achieving recognition and regulatory approval as an accepted option in the therapeutic armamentarium for use in dystonia. Its beneficial effects are admittedly of short duration (days) and inconstant from one patient to the next and within any particular patient over time. These factors mean that presently in many countries rTMS is not ‘covered’ or reimbursed by insurers or health systems.

In the U.S., rTMS devices are still investigational with regard to dystonia treatment—only available to patients enrolled in clinical trials. Some rTMS devices are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for stimulation of peripheral nerves but can be used off-label by physicians to treat other neurological disorders not approved by FDA. But insurers won't pay for rTMS treatments when they are given off-label. So in the U.S. and in other countries, generally patients who want to try rTMS for their dystonia will have to pay for the treatments out-of-pocket.

The same is also true for use of Botox/Myoblock treatments for dystonia in some countries. Until now, there has been inadequate control of the stimulation site. It is possible that the rTMS stimulation site could/should be varied on an individual basis. It seems logical to propose the use of fMRI functional imaging for such a purpose, but its use should be adapted to each individual patient’s symptoms and affected body part(s). Even after localizing the site by using fMRI or other measurments, the rTMS coil has to be placed accurately by the clinician. Procedural consistency is a major issue in producing decisive, actionable research results and journal publications that will convince payors and regulators. Stimulation protocols are currently defined by several parameters: the frequency of the rTMS stimulation (>5 Hz) or inhibition (<1 Hz), and the intensity and the number of stimuli influencing the amplitude and duration of the effect. Unfortunately, the effect has so far been variable in each patient. Paradoxical (non-beneficial and adverse) reactions have been observed in more than 15% of normal individuals treated with rTMS. In other words, don’t undertake rTMS lightly. It is entirely possible that, for you, it might make you worse than you are right now.

rTMS coil and mannequin
Medications used to treat dystonia are a brute-force, nonspecific ‘systemic’ option. Sledge hammer precision. Not ideal, but not to be ignored, particularly in extreme situations. Meds include:
  • Trihexyphenidyl
  • Benztropine
  • Anticonvulsants
  • Procyclidine
  • Muscle relaxants
  • Levodopa/carbidopa
  • Bromocriptine
Botox® or Myoblock® injected directly into the muscles affected by dystonia weakens the muscle. This may help improve symptoms of dystonia for 3 to 4 months, but the relief is in general not permanent. And the weakening may itself prevent concert-level performance, Leon Fleisher’s good results notwithstanding. The botulinum toxin preparation used in China is mostly CBTX-A® (Lanzhou Biological Products Institute, 888 Yanchanglu, Lanzhou, Gansu Lanzhou, Gansu 730046, China; Phone : ‎+86 931 8340311), which is a little less potent than Botox® (and therefore may need to be repeated more often) but much less expensive (Allergan Inc.)

Trihexyphenidyl and other anti-cholinergics that are sometimes used to treat dystonia may produce chorea or other movement disorders that are more severe than the dystonia. So it is best to be cautious. None of these options is ‘benign’; all of them have significant limitations/risks as well as strengths/benefits. You need to consult a neurologist who is expert in the treatment of dystonia in musicians to make a proper choice. [Besides the links above for the Beijing-based CMT commenter/emailer] the links below may help you to find such a person near your location, who can help you review the options and decide.

Meds that themselves sometimes cause dystonia as a side-effect include the following:
  • Levodopa/carbidopa
  • Bromocriptine
  • Antipsychotic meds
  • Metoclopramide
  • Dilantin
  • Calcium channel blockers
  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
  • Ergotamines
  • Antihistamines (esp. cetirizine Zyrtec)
Focal dystonia has a prevalence of 29.5 per 100,000 people in the general population as reported by Nutt and coworkers at the Mayo Clinic some years ago, but, then and now, dystonia often goes un-diagnosed or mis-diagnosed. Almost certainly the 1-in-200 remark at the top in the blockquote from Anna Conti, Seth Pullman, and Steven Frucht is the relevant figure with regard to musicians—both professional ones and serious amateurs. Curiously childhood- and adolescent-onset primary dystonia is more common in Jews of Eastern European or Ashkenazi ancestry, compared to the general population. Possibly there are genetic factors that will be found to be important in dystonia in Chinese and other populations. Although most cases of focal dystonia in musicians come to the attention of neurologists when the patients are in their 20s or later, it is more and more common to see the condition diagnosed at earlier ages. Possibly this is a correlate of the trend in many countries toward larger numbers of kids receiving intensive training as elite-level musicians, especially in China. But to-date there are no journal articles or other research publications that report on this.

Thank you very much for the question. I hope this post is useful to you. Please feel free to comment or email me again on this topic, or let other CMT readers know what results you have had with interventions you try.




Thursday, September 18, 2008

Mendelssohn’s Premature Death

Felix Mendelssohn
The medical basis for Felix Mendelssohn’s death at age 37 of a stroke—only a few months after his sister Fanny’s death of a stroke—has not to date been adequately described in the journal literature. But in recent years there has been intensive research on mutations of the NOTCH3 gene on chromosome 19. Might a NOTCH3 mutation have been the cause of Mendelssohn’s dying? We do not know. But the facts and family history are highly suggestive. NOTCH3 mutations give rise to a variety of hereditary abnormalities including stroke at an early age. Previously termed Familial Stroke Syndrome, CADASIL (cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leucoencephalopathy) is associated with NOTCH3 mutation. And within the past several years there is also now a commercial laboratory offering genomic testing for NOTCH3 variants. You may like to have a look at the sources below—especially if you have a family history anything like Mendelssohn’s?

Or not (as your own preferences and insurance coverage considerations suggest to you is best), inasmuch as there is presently no cure for the NOTCH3-related disorders. But knowing that you have a NOTCH3 point mutation may at least help as regards proper care in dosing with aspirin and other anticoagulants (“blood thinners”) either in surgery or on a chronic basis. And, since the condition is autosomal dominant (AD), knowing that you have it is very important for family planning and parent-child communication.

The person [electing to undertake voluntary genomic testing or screening] may benefit in the long run from making preventive lifestyle choices that will help counteract the biological risk [that is associated with the genotype that they have inherited].”
  —  Personalized Medicine, U.S. News & World Report, 23-APR-2008.
Chromosome 19



Sunday, April 29, 2007

Lutes and Lumbricals

Lumbrical Muscles
DSM: A lute player friend of mine has been having progressively more difficulty with his left hand. Focal Dystonia, probably. Nothing so bad as Leon Fleisher’s difficulties years ago or anything like that. But still a major impediment to his performance practice and concertizing.

CMT: There’s still the problem of diagnostic accuracy for Focal Dystonia—and the imprecision of knowing how a loss of “representational specificity” or other changes in the brain can come about through over-use of the hand; the uncertainty of explaining why Botox injected peripherally actually brings about an improvement in this condition if the cause is ‘central’, in the brain. Is your friend sure that it’s Focal Dystonia and not Carpal Tunnel Syndrome or something else?

DSM: Well, no. The neurologists he’s seen have been inconclusive. One hand surgeon wanted to persuade him to be operated for Carpal Tunnel, but my friend regards that as a last resort. And the neurologists’ EMG and imaging and other studies have not been terribly helpful in ruling anything in or out yet. His main complaint has to do with a loss of strength in the lumbrical muscles in his hand, especially the ones involved in moving the middle finger and the ring finger. So it’s not a textbook picture of Focal Dystonia. I suspect he’ll have to go to one of the Performing Arts Medicine clinics that have neurologists experienced in this, as opposed to the well-meaning neurologists and electromyographers he’s seen so far, who have no particular expertise in the problems of musicians.

CMT: There are probably some string players with variant anatomy who just happen to have asymmetrically strong mechanical connections between the ring and middle extrinsic flexor muscles.

Supposedly the phenomenon of middle-ring ‘enslaving’ or ‘subordination’ has a big neural component. If it’s ‘central’ or ‘neural’ then in principle it should be susceptible to retraining through exercises. The connections between adjacent digits involving tendons and muscle fiber groupings of the deep flexor (flexor digitorum profundus) play a big part, though. The ‘peripheral’ biomechanical component shouldn’t be underestimated—it definitely contributes to some of the ‘enslaving’ or ‘subordination’ of one finger to the other. But recent work is showing that enslaving effects among different hand muscles involve both central neural interaction among the structures controlling flexor muscles and lumbricals in the hand as well as peripheral mechanical interactions.

It’s possible that your friend is someone who just happens to have anatomy with substantial tendon sharing. In medical school, I dissected a hand with two lumbrical muscles at each place where you’d ordinarily find only one, and the muscles inserted to adjacent digits. This anatomical variation is not at all uncommon. And if you’re born with this anatomical variation and choose to play lute, then the motions involved in virtuosic lute playing may place particularly great stresses on your aberrant anatomy, in ways that might not affect persons with conventional anatomy quite so severely.

DSM: So what’s going on when we retrain or ‘retune’ the biomechanics with Constraint-Induced Therapy or other physical therapy techniques?

CMT: Well, we learn independent ring and middle finger motion by altering how we activate the controlling networks in the brain, in the primary motor cortex. Neurons in motor cortex aren’t like house-wiring: they don’t make simple direct connections to individual muscles. Instead, our evolution as mammals has set us up to flex and extend our fingers together and to grasp things. Independent digit movements outside of the index finger and thumb require complex inter-neuron coordination to get the desired balance in muscle force at each joint.

Completely independent digit motion is the result of a complex pattern of activation that isolates a movement by preventing other movements mechanically and perhaps by inhibiting some muscles as well. This is why it takes lots of repetitions to learn such skills. Learning new motor skills changes the way muscles and movements are represented topographically among the cells of the motor cortex, and also the way sensory information is represented in the sensory cortex.

Here’s some anatomy, just to give you an idea of where things are, and why the geometry and biomechanics of the hand are so vulnerable as they are.

Crossection of hand, 4 fingers, distal to thumb










Upper Left

Lower Left

Lower Right

Upper Right


1. Distal palmar fat pad

2. First lumbrical m.

3. Tendons mm. flexors digitorum superficialis and profundus

4. Tendons mm. interosseous
and lumbrical


5. Proximal phalanx, second digit

6. Second lumbrical m.



7. Tendon extensor digitorum communis

8. Dorsal and palmar interosseous mm.

9. Tendon m. extensor indicis proprius

10. Collateral ligament

11. Tendons mm. interosseous
and lumbrical


12. Proximal phalanx, third digit

13. Tendon m. extensor digitorum communis



14. Tendons and mm. dorsal
and palmar interosseous

15. Tendons mm. interosseous
and lumbrical


16. Tendon m. extensor digitorum communis

17. Proximal phalanx, fourth digit

18. Tendons mm. interosseous
and lumbrical


19. Tendons mm. flexors digitorum
superficialis and profundus



20. Proximal phalanx, fifth digit

21. Articular capsule and collateral ligament

22. Interphalangeal joint

23. Middle phalanx, fifth digit

24. Fifth digit, distal segment fat pad

25. Fibrous digital sheath

26. Tendon m. flexor digitorum
profundus



The photomacrograph of a transverse whole-section of the hand passes through the four fingers. The slice is taken of a cadaver hand, a frozen section, distal to the thumb—right at the end of the hand, before the fingers start. You can see that the little finger is separated from the others, which makes sense if you look at your own hand. The gap between the little finger and the ring finger comes proximally further into the hand, compared to the gaps between the other fingers. The articulation (22) between the proximal (20) and middle (23) phalanges is seen in the cross-sectional slice in the picture above. This is a pretty bulky hand. Probably not the hand of a musician. But the image helps to give you and idea of the anatomical relationships just the same.

Notice how the extensor tendon to the ring (fourth) finger is very closely applied to its dorsal surface. Not much clearance there! The tendons and distal ends of both interosseous and lumbrical muscles (8, 11, 14, 15, 18) are identified in the picture in relation to the middle digit proximal phalanx (12). The first (2) and second (6) lumbricals are seen close to, and on the radial side of, their tendons of origin. The two lateral (first and second) lumbricals arise from the radial side of the palmer aspect of the first and second tendons of flexor digitorum profundus. The two medial (third and fourth) arise from adjacent sides of the second and third, and the third and fourth tendons of flexor digitorum profundus. The muscles insert into the radial border of the tendon of extensor digitorum on the back of the proximal phalanx. The compactness of this anatomy reveals why the mechanical leverage and pulley-and-lever structures are so exquisitely sensitive. The fulcrums for the action of the lumbricals on the phalanges operate at a relatively high mechanical advantage (force ratio), and therefore small disturbances in the muscles themselves or in the tendon bundle and the tendons’ insertion points can give rise to surprisingly large disturbances in the motion—velocity of attack and release, power, etc.—at the phalanx.

Principles of Neuroplasticity—Strategies for Rehabilitation for Focal Dystonia through Forced Use:
  • Based on the assumption that patients will more readily use the extremity that is normal (unaffected) unless you restrict it.
  • Forcing the use of the affected extremity will modify muscle structure and increase function.
  • Effective for pianists but not for guitarists or lutenists.

Constraint-Induced Therapy (Sensory Motor Retuning):
  • Elbert, Sterr, and colleagues studied 7 musicians with Focal Dystonia.
  • Forced use on the instrument with a splint that restricted the movement of each finger; 10 days, 7 hrs each day.
  • Six of 7 improved; less improvement for guitarists or lutenists than for pianists.

In the absence of a definitive diagnosis, the Physical Therapist or Rehabilitation Medicine practitioner may treat on an empirical basis:
  • Treat the initial injury as part of [an empirically conjectured—] inflammatory, healing process.
  • Decrease stress and stop negative abnormal patterns of movement.

At least in me, there are strong linkages between the middle and ring fingers when I attempt to flex the middle finger at the distal (end) joints. This probably involves mechanical linkages between the profundus muscles for those two fingers—linkages at the level of both proximal tendon and muscle. Nobody knows whether those linkages can evolve over time under conditions of high repetition stress or over-use.

DSM: Obviously, if inflammation is present, you’d expect that some fibrosis and linkage would occur as part of the healing and response to the inflammation.

CMT: But if no overt tendonitis or other inflammatory process is going on, it’s not clear whether a fibrotic proliferative reaction would occur, to give rise to the kind of symptoms your friend is experiencing. Assuming it’s not Focal Dystonia, the Constraint-Induced Therapy of “retuning” exercises can help to compensate for any abnormal anatomical linkages that might be in his hand. Best of luck to your lutenist friend!