Showing posts with label health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Party of Two? Valentines, Chamber Music & Health

Valentines
I n writing a successful quartet, composers have to turn inward and look for their most personal musical message. So also do the performers. There is no room for deception—nothing to disguise it and make it superficially attractive. Seduction or manipulation will be obvious and will fail. Everything in quartets and other small chamber forms is about honesty and mutual discovery.”
  —  Saul Bitran, violinist, Cuarteto Latinoamericano.
T    he only way to reanimate these pieces is to play them with friends... When you’re ‘on’, not only are you breathing together, but you are also feeding off each other. You’re playing with someone who does something spontaneously and you respond, also spontaneously, which takes your performance and experience together to another level entirely.”
  —  Kathryn Selby, pianist, Macquarrie Trio.
C hamber music, besides being very intimate, is substantially concerned with understanding the other performer(s) on deep levels—doing this in an open and undirected way—and concerned, too, with being generous and responsive to the significant other(s) and creating valuable and meaningful things together with them.

I n that regard, almost any piece of chamber music might be considered to be coherent with the values celebrated on Valentine's Day. Almost all chamber music nurtures a sense of closeness, immediacy, and anticipation.

Y ou want something that is already at least slightly familiar and known to be pleasurable to and enjoyed by your partner—so there will be low risk of disappointment and the greatest probability for delight.

T o heighten the anticipation, an experience that is already familiar can be the subject of hints or other gestures to plan for the experience and savoring that experience. But in order to be worthy of anticipation, the thing hinted at must also be novel in some way, not routine.

B ut there are side-effects each piece can have—inherent objective, physiologic consequences (unintended or otherwise) that accompany the music’s subjective emotional/cognitive/inspirational effects (see Lemmer and other links below). A little quickening of the pulse and transient high blood pressure is what you are after. What I had not expected is how long (many hours) it lasts!
  • Understand distinctions between history, entitlement, and managerial theories of the self and the significant other.
  • Avoid defensive, self-protective ‘Model I’ patterns of interpersonal interaction that blame others and limit learning.
  • Emphasize shared goals, fearlessness, and equality—mutual influence in relationship.
  • Emphasize modesty of proportion, pleasure of execution, resiliency in the face of set-backs, and durability of vision and passion.
  • Love is an organization—one that is deserving of deliberate, rational, caring management.
  • Love is an organization that, like any other enterprise, has explicit and implicit processes—and denying this or neglecting the processes can only but lead to chaos, low client satisfaction, and investor disappointment.
  • Communicate and critically test each other’s assumptions and beliefs openly and often.
  • Combine mutual advocacy with inquiry.
  • Combine shared exertion with shared relaxation and a minimum of irritability and aggression.
Lemmer, Rat Valentines, Hypertension, & Ligeti Quartets
M    ozart’s and Haydn’s music had only a slight reducing effect on the heart rate of the spontaneously-hypertensive (SHR) rats, and the blood pressure remained unaffected. The normotensive WKY rats showed no reaction at all. Ligeti’s String Quartet No. 2, on the contrary, caused a massive increase in SBP of around 20 to 30mmHg in the SHR rats which remained discernable over more than 10 hours. The WKY rats also reacted to Ligeti’s music with a raised SBP.”
  —  Björn Lemmer, Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
I  am not saying to eschew the Ligeti in favor of Mozart or Haydn for Valentine’s Day—not at all; far from it. In fact, the Ligeti may be precisely what you two will prefer on that adventurous intimate occasion. You are looking for a string quartet whose climax is like the last lines of a poem that choke you up a bit; focus the mind and heart, so to say. Sort of like catching sight of the sea—unexpectedly; together. Twenty or 30 mmHg of higher blood pressure for a few hours is precisely what you two are looking for...

C    oming back through the Chiba coast I thought of Shonagon’s list—of all those signs one has only to name to quicken the heart, just name. To us, a sun is not quite a sun unless it’s radiant; a spring not quite a spring unless it is limpid. There is a way of saying boat, rock, mist, frog, crow, hail, heron, chrysanthemum—a concise way that includes them all, implies them all.”
  —  Chris Marker, Sans Soleil.




Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Musicians’ Focal Dystonia Update 2011

Focal dystonia
L    osses incurred in the wounding and in the healing both serve as ‘seeds’ for growth. We cannot wish away the loss, so it is well if we accept the seeds and nurture them, and see what fruit they bear.”
T here have been several dozen readers (TCP/IP addresses in U.S., Canada, U.K., Greece, Italy, Germany) who have landed on this blog in the past 2 weeks by searching Google with “focal dystonia” and related phrases. Some of them used the phrase ‘personalized medicine’ or ‘genomics testing’ as part of their Google search. In response, I want to provide some new resources, beyond ones in my previous focal dystonia-related posts in past years (links below). It is not my intent that all of the resources will be relevant to everybody who reads this post, only that some of the materials will be useful to some of the readers.

W hile I do not have dystonia myself, I know a couple of musicians who do have it. They developed it after years of intensive performance and work at leading conservatories, after achieving mastery of their respective instruments and after having embarked on promising concert careers. For each of these friends, the condition was career-changing. Both are now teaching, primarily; the shift in their attention is source of much joy and satisfaction, surely, and a fantastic treasure in terms of effective, practical pedagogy imparted to the next generation. But it comes at tremendous cost, in terms of foregone income and beauty—performances and recordings prevented, in careers hobbled by focal dystonia.

M y interest in keeping track of current state-of-the-art with regard to diagnosing and treating focal dystonia is in direct proportion to the distress and disappointment I have witnessed in these friends. Besides the recent spate of anonymous searches and CMT page-views, the emails I receive from CMT readers confirm that this condition frequently goes unrecognized or un-diagnosed for years, depending on whether there are dystonia-experienced clinicians accessible to you, ones who specialize in caring for musicians or other performing artists. In other words, if a doctor has never ever seen a case of dystonia before, the probability that he/she will diagnose one now is disproportionately low. This problem is compounded by the fact that focal dystonia does not have obvious signs and symptoms when seen in the clinic.

W ith the intensifying interest in relatively inexpensive direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing from deCODE and 23andme and other companies and with recent years’ trend toward consumers’ taking progressively greater responsibility for diagnosing and managing their own health conditions, I gather together links below, links to the most recent research literature that bears on genetics and genomic polymorphisms that might enable musicians to look at their DTC genomics tests’ raw file download results and bring that evidence with them when they meet with their physicians. Given that the spectrum of focal dystonia is quite broad and pleomorphic, maybe this will help musicians to take charge of the situation, especially if the doctors seem too inclined to ‘wait and see’ or discount the severity of what the patient in front of them is complaining of. Even if the physician has no prior experience with genomics tests per se, it is hard for the physician to be dismissive when the patient in front of him/her is knowledgeable and comes bearing specific evidence with the expectation the evidence will be discussed.

I n this regard, if one of my friends who has focal dystonia discovered that he does have one of the dystonia-associated genomic polymorphisms, then that discovery might be helpful to him and his wife with regard to preventing dystonia in their kids, insofar as the intensity and duration of musical-instrument practice are strongly correlated with triggering the onset of dystonia. One can be a genetic carrier of the genetic variation but remain asymptomatic so long as one doesn’t hit the trigger-point in terms of over-use or over-training. If you are a parent, such information would surely modulate how you approach the musical education of your children...

A t present, researchers have recognized multiple forms of dystonia that have strong association with genetic variations. They have so far identified multiple genes and chromosomal locations responsible for various forms of dystonia. Most of these are rarer and more severe forms than the focal variety that is seen in musicians. But the same genes—and some of the same variations/mutations—have been found to be involved in cases of musicians’ dystonia.
  • DYT1 (TOR1A) – Early onset-primary dystonia
  • DYT2 () – Autosomal recessive primary dystonia
  • DYT3 (TAF1) – X-linked dystonia
  • DYT4 () – Non-DYT1 spasmodic ‘whispering dysphonia’ [singing]
  • DYT5 (GCH1) – Dopa-responsive dystonia
  • DYT6 (THAP1) – Adolescent-onset mixed-type dystonia
  • DYT7 () – Adult-onset primary dystonia
  • DYT8 (MR1) – Paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia
  • DYT9 () – Paroxysmal choreoathetosis with dystonic spasticity
  • DYT10 () – Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia
  • DYT11 (SGCE) – Myoclonus dystonia
  • DYT12 (ATP1A3) – Rapid-onset dystonia-Parkinsonism (RDP)
  • DYT13 () – Early- and late-onset focal dystonia
  • DYT15 () - Alcohol-responsive myoclonic dystonia
  • DYT16 (PRKRA) - Dystonia-Parkinsonism
  • DYT17 () - Segmental or generalized dystonia with dysphonia [singing]
  • DYT18 (SLC2A1)
  • DYT19 () - Episodic kinesigenic dyskinesia 2
  • DYT20 () - Paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia 2
T o the reader who recently emailed me, the Phe205Ile (613T>A; see Calakos 2010, link below) polymorphism in the TOR1A gene on Chr. 9 is associated with jaw/embouchure dystonia in the cases that have been studied to-date, although there may be other genes and polymorphisms associated with that condition/phenotype, too. Unfortunately, this particular SNP polymorphism is not included at this time in the microarray chips that 23andme and deCODEme use for their DTC genomics testing, and it is not available in other presently-available tests either so far as I can tell. There are, however, 7 TOR1A SNPs and 4 TOR1B SNPs that are tested, 16 SNPs in the GCH1 gene, 9 SNPs in SGCE, 2 SNPs in ATP1A3, 6 in MR1, 2 in PRKRA, 2 in TAF1, and so on. These are there in your 23andme raw file download results, ready for you to look at and see whether you do or don’t have a variant polymorphism at one or more of these SNP locations.

A t any rate, there seems to be a pent-up demand for resources, links, referrals, anything at all—an unmet need for new information or updates, year-to-year—plus a considerable amount of new information that has accumulated since I last put up a blog post on this topic. Which is why I gather these things and put them up online right now.

M usicians’ dystonia is a task-specific movement disorder that produces cramping and loss of voluntary motor control of muscles that are involved in highly-trained movements associated with performing music. About 1% of all professional musicians develop musicians’ dystonia, although the percentage may be considerably higher since there are many whose condition is never definitively diagnosed and many whose change of career never comes to the attention of researchers who write the journal articles reporting the nominal 1% prevalence figure.

T he pathophysiology of the disorder is not completely clarified. Findings in neurophysiology testing include reduced inhibitory signals at different levels in the brain, abnormal neuroplasticity, and altered sensory perception. Epidemiologically, there is higher risk for those musicians who play instruments requiring maximal fine-motor skills, such as piano, but the condition also occurs in brass players, double-reed players, and singers. For instruments where workload differs across hands, focal dystonia appears more often in the more intensely-used hand—the right hand in guitarists and lutenists. Preliminary findings also suggest a genetic contribution to focal task-specific dystonia with phenotypic variations including musicians’ dystonia. Treatment options include pharmacological interventions, such as trihexyphenidyl or botulinum toxin-A, as well as retraining programs and ergonomic changes in the instrument. Only a minority of musicians, however, return to fully-normal motor control using the currently available therapies. The non-optimality of current therapies—combined with the expectation that identifying the genes, genetic variations, and receptors that are involved in the condition may lead to new, more-effective therapies targeting those receptors in the nervous system—are what drives the recent genomics-based research in this area.

A t the Glasgow Royal Infirmary’s Department of Physiotherapy, eight musicians recently volunteered to take part in a retraining protocol and were studied by Patrice Berque and collaborators. Intensive ‘constraint-induced therapy’ and motor control retraining at slow speed were the interventions Berque examined. They made video recordings of the subjects playing. They measured ‘Frequency of Abnormal Movements’ scale (FAM), the change in metronome speed achieved during motor control retraining, plus two other dystonia evaluation scales. Over a 12-month period, the FAM scale scores showed statistically and clinically significant decrease in the number of abnormal movements per second of instrumental playing. Statistically, significant changes did not appear until about 8 months of therapy. Berque’s results suggest that a combination of constraint-induced therapy and specific motor control retraining may be a successful strategy for the treatment of musicians’ focal dystonia, and suggest that many months may elapse before significant progress occurs.

I n Cheng’s series, three people were found to have the delGAG deletion in the TOR1A (DYT1) gene, and two patients were found to have polymorphisms in the THAP1 gene (224A>T, 449A>C). The overall mutation frequency was 4.5% in Cheng’s patients, with TOR1A mutations found in 2.7% and THAP1 mutations found in 1.8%. No mutations were detected in the control population of normal Chinese. The significance with respect to musicians’ dystonia is not addressed by Cheng, but, by implication, we may anticipate that the genomic epidemiology of musicians’ dystonia may be subject to racial/ethnic variations in much the same manner as the genomic epidemiology of other forms of dystonia varies by race and ethnic ancestry.