Showing posts with label entrepreneurship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label entrepreneurship. Show all posts

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Savvy Musicianship: Marti Epstein’s ‘Troubled Queen’

Jackson Pollock, ‘Troubled Queen’, 1945
W  hen I am painting, I’m not aware of what I’m doing. It is only after a sort of ‘get acquainted’ period that I see [in the painting-in-progress] what I have been about. I have no fears about making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own. I just try to let it come through.”
  — Jackson Pollock.
H ave a listen to Marti Epstein’s new composition, ‘Troubled Queen’:



I t’s a 21-minute piece for mixed ensemble consisting of flute, bass clarinet, trombone, 2 violins, viola, cello, piano, and percussion—commissioned by the Callithumpian Consort, and premièred on 19-DEC-2011 at New England Conservatory in Boston.

B rooding, dark, and pulsatile... inspired by Jackson Pollock’s brooding, dark, pulsatile 1945 painting of the same name, one of the holdings of Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts.

C allithumpian Consort was founded by Stephen Drury in the 1990s and is dedicated to the proposition that music should be, and is, an ‘experience’. The ensemble is deeply committed to supporting new music. Besides frequent performances of new music, Callithumpian also seeks to foster a vibrant and financially sustainable environment for composers and composing, and has commissioned many compositions over the past 15 years.

I  would say that the composition students here are not composing jazz. Specifically, they’re not composing commercial music; they’re not composing ‘jingles’. They may be composing film music, because we have a lot of dual majors. They’re usually composing music that’s artistically interesting and specifically for the concert hall... To graduate [from Berklee], students have to have a portfolio of pieces and—very important—they have to have a certain number of these pieces performed. Because one of the aspects of a composer’s training is, how do you get people to play your music? So we try to get them to start doing that right away.”
  — Marti Epstein.
I hope her composition students had a chance to attend the première. Epstein leads by example. She doesn’t play musical ‘hardball’ with the listener or with the performers but instead pitches balls that are hittable, ‘accessible’. Not predictable or ‘easy’ pitches, surely. But captivating; natural; intuitive; emotionally moving and ‘fair’, not off-putting. This new ‘Troubled Queen’ is emblematic of the practical philosophy Epstein expresses in her remarks on Berklee’s website (quote above).

W  hen I’m asked the inevitable question ‘What kind of music do you write?,’ I am always embarrassingly at a loss for words. Musicians want to know details of my harmonic language: is my music tonal or atonal? Nonmusicians often ask nervously if it sounds ‘modern’. Here’s the best way I can describe it: it is neither tonal nor atonal; I adhere to no preexisting method of pitch or harmony organization. I am more interested in the use of sounds as organizing musical materials than I am in melody or harmonic relationships. I also do not believe that atonality even truly exists; the term was an attempt to describe the music that broke away from Common Practice Tonality... My music is generally slow-paced. I always tell people that ‘You can take the girl out of Nebraska, but you can’t take the Nebraska out of the girl.’ The wide-open spaces that I experienced as a child, not so much in my living environment, but in the many car trips we took to Colorado to see my grandparents, were—and are—an integral part of my artistic psyche... I love living in the East, but I long for the space and expanse of the place in my childhood memories. I feel like my music is an expression of that longing.”
  — Marti Epstein.
Marti Epstein, photo (c) Bill GalleryL ike the Pollock painting for which the piece is named, Epstein’s ‘Troubled Queen’ ably evokes/represents psychiatric illness-as-storm—these looming clouds; this mixture of scary unrealness and can’t-look-away awe; these oppressive feelings that elude attempts to control them. This dark-grey, nightmarish 4-bpm thunder and lightning—or is it a deranged heartbeat? [bradycardic between 07:09 to 09:01, becoming asystolic at 20:30]

T he self-doubts, the dread and anxiety, the fractured esteem: are these contributing ‘causes’ or triggers of depression, or are they merely some associated ‘effects’ or symptoms of the condition? Chaotic arpeggios in the piano part; strokes of blue and green and yellow in the winds and strings and percussion—random sonic hail pelting us unbidden, as if formed by Pollockian flicking: flung up into the air, falling now under the unstoppable force of gravity. Callithumpian Consort members’ playing is sensitive and inspired in capturing this ‘Nature is not kind’ harshness...

G othic interiority. Obscure totems; we’re not sure what they mean or how we got here.
Reduction of life to crashing, heaviness. Primitive glare, no escape.

T he interleaved string, woodwind, and brass passages around 14:00-15:00 are especially poignant, and contribute yet more evidence demonstrating the ‘organic’/biologic origins of depression, disabusing the listener of any misconception he/she might have held regarding the depressed person’s responsibility to ‘prevent’ the condition or exercise more self-control and simply ‘Get better!’ under his/her own steam.

W hat’s more, the 21-minute timescale of this piece offers enough latitude to explore the wide range of colors and cognitive states that characterize moderate-to-severe clinical depression. In other words, this is the sort of subject that demands considerable scope; a ‘miniature’ would not be right at all, and would at best be pastiche, unless it were a cue in a film score, subject to constraints of the script and action. Fully developed in this 21-minute work, the character/subject becomes very real. The suffering/horror this depressed protagonist experiences is fully animated and convincing, and, through the performance, we can’t help but care about this person and about the plight of other such people in society. In summary, this new Marti Epstein composition is a beautiful work: it illustrates not only wonderful artistry and craftsmanship, but also conveys the political and social savvy that ‘the arts’ (artists/musicians, and the supporters who finance them and commission works from them) can have, to bring about wider and deeper appreciation for socially/clinically important issues and provoke concord and action to make things better.

E very so often, a painter has to ‘destroy’ painting. Picasso did it; Pollock; numerous others, too. And every so often, a composer has to destroy composing. Here, Epstein smashes conventional ideas of a composition—as John Cage and many others have done. But this ‘Troubled Queen’ is very clearly a composition—and a very beautiful, moving one at that.
Stephen Drury

Monday, July 2, 2007

Working in Music: Classical Musicians As Entrepreneurs


























S  imilar to Nadel’s 1998 observation that an architect is not a designer of buildings but instead a business person whose work product is architecture, I found that the musician is a business person whose product results in music performance and consumption. . . . My findings concurred with Rogers’s 2002 study, which found that 62% of musicians considered communication skills to be the most important to [sustainability of] their professional practice.”
  — Dawn Bennett, MS Thesis, 2005, Univ Western Australia.


T he future of live classical music? Disappearing! The odds of winning an orchestral job? Not good! The security of an orchestral job? Not great!The job market for clarinetists? Poor! The chances of making a living strictly playing the clarinet? Not going to happen! The stability and likelihood of your symphony orchestra financially surviving the next 25 years? Tenuous, at best. Sure: follow your dreams, follow your heart, set your goals high. But each year, conservatories and universities graduate hundreds whose playing ability borders on the unbelievable. We’ve all heard many of them play. The sad fact is that most will never earn their living by just playing. There are just not enough places for them to play. All too quickly, it will become apparent that playing the ‘audition roulette’ circuit takes its toll, both financially and mentally. When you are young, the notion of being a professional musician sounds noble, intriguing—the ideal vocation. However, after a few years, when your friends have moved on and bought their own homes, have their retirement plans in place, have disposable income, have medical benefits, and treat themselves to the better things in life, the professional musician monicker loses its luster very quickly. The dream dies hard and fast. A struggling musician is not a pretty sight.”
  — bulletin board post by ‘GBK’
http://test.woodwind.org/clarinet/BBoard/read.html

DSM: Having your dreams is wonderful, but there are far too few performance opportunities, and too many musicians competing for the small number of opportunities available. Why is this so hard to understand? If there were a glut of plumbers, everybody would understand that and not train to be a plumber. Somehow there’s the sense that since it’s Art, then Reality should be held at bay. Well, you can still play. You just have get a day job, or two day jobs, or three. And that’s what musicians generally do. In the U.S. and other countries that lack government support for the Arts, that’s what they’ve always done. It’s a shame that the conservatories’ curricula tend not to acknowledge this reality and prepare their students for it.

CMT: Would we want our football and basketball coaches to lead the dreamers among their players to believe that they can play in the pros if they just want it badly enough and follow their hearts? No. In just the same manner, young musicians need to make sure that they have a way to make a life for themselves. And, I agree with you, the music curricula and career counseling services should be designed to insure that they do that—produce graduates who are able to do several things well, and who are entrepreneurial and able to achieve some degree of financial stability as well as artistic success. Equip them with dreams plus abilities plus a safety net!

DSM: And counsel them, too, on unions—not just on entrepreneurship. Not everyone is suited to start and run their own business. Making more than ‘scale’? Busking can be interesting in your twenties; but it can’t be interesting in your seventies. I have to tell you—the U.S. Department of Labor 2006-07 statistics for classical musician earnings are pretty discouraging. The trend is not good, comparing that report with previous years’ versions of the same report.

CMT: Besides teaching and a cultivating your practice of private lessons and clinics, what is there? Do demo work for a large music store. Found an indie recording studio. Compose for film if you can. Become a music festival organizer. Write jingles for broadcast advertising and industrial tradeshow displays. Try to work part-time as a studio musician. Be a traveling rep for an instrument manufacturer. Do ensemble playing for society events or—Horrors!—weddings and funerals. Try to get a decent-paying gig in a church or synagogue? All of those are low-odds opportunities—in general, few and far between.

Violin Busker
DSM: I think a major cause of musicians’ unstable employment has had to do with the difficulty in discovering what opportunities are ‘open’. The MusicalChairs webservice does quite a lot to correct this situation. MusicalChairs has timely postings of classical music performance openings, by country and geographic location. ChamberMusicAmerica’s publications are a help, too. But periodic print publications are no match for the Web.

CMT: And don’t forget social networking sites like Josh Gindele’s ClassicalLounge.com—those are another valuable resource for networking and discovering opportunities!


I t is an institution’s unwavering will to present interesting programs – not simply popular ones – that builds audiences over time, and narrows the spread between high-selling and low-selling concerts.”
  —  Christopher Stager.