Showing posts with label master class. Show all posts
Showing posts with label master class. Show all posts

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Philippe Pierlot’s Viola da Gamba Masterclass at BEMF

 Philippe Pierlot and Gamba T  he excellence of a teacher is revealed by his/her manner with students—and the ‘light’ that he/she sheds. Philippe Pierlot yesterday conducted a viola da gamba masterclass at BEMF that was exceptionally illuminating—not just for the three students whose performance was critiqued but also for every one of the 100 or so audience members. Philippe’s discussion of Baroque rhythms and ‘inégal’ bowing technique (interpretive emphasis, using a different percentages of bow on two consecutive notes, e.g., on upbeat and downbeat) was magical. Bravo!

Y    our middle finger is the most important, for bow control.”
R    emember that these Marais pieces are dances. This one’s pulse should be in ‘1’, not counted in 3 beats per measure. This other one must be played so that its pulse is in ‘2’, not creeping along in ‘4’.”
Y    ou must think of the phrase structure of the passage you are playing. Think of this as a sentence. Be clear about your intentions—about what you wish to say, and, of course, about what Marais was saying—before you begin.”
P    lay with your bow straight. You must bend your elbow with a fluid motion. Your bowing should be perpendicular, not to your own body, but instead perpendicular to the lady whose [carved] head is at the top of the viol’s pegbox. It is her you are playing for.”
T    hink ‘vocally’. There is no need to ‘mark’ the downbeats—they are obvious enough from the melody line. The phrase structure is enough. Understatement is what you are looking for.”
I    n Marais your releases should be gentle. Respect the ‘end’ of each note.”
K    eep the fingers of your left hand curved. Fingers that are too flat on the fingerboard will give a tone that is confused.”
M    aintain equal bow pressure on both strings in your double-stops. There are of course a few situations where equal sounding of both strings is not wanted, but this is not one of those situations.”
M    any phrase-endings in Marais and others of that period have a retiring, dwindling at the end. Not a diminuendo exactly, more like the end of a thought.”
A    nticipations (before downbeat) have great importance in Marais’s music, and they should get extra emphasis—often more than the subsequent beat. Do not discount the upbeat, the appoggiaturas. This thing is full—full of appogiaturas. They are not so much ‘ornaments’ as the essence of the piece.”
L    ay your bow on the string and push ‘up’; do not push ‘down’ or ‘into’ the string. You must send your tone up! Up to her whose head is at the top of the pegbox. Every note should be lifted ‘up’.”
Y    our bowhold wastes 5 cm. You must hold your bow back close to the frog, close to the nut. If you do not hold it there, you will have a thready tone, the balance of weight will be all wrong and you will have to press your bowhair into the string. Look! Hold it this way, back by the nut, and gravity will do everything for you. Just touch! [the bow to the string] Just let the bow fall onto the string, like so!”
P    lay closer to the bridge—about 4 cm to 6 cm from the bridge. It is a stronger, brighter sound there. And because it is louder, you will not need so much bowspeed to pronounce the notes. Less bowspeed means less arm and bow motion, and you will have plenty of bow left for some of these phrases. You will not have to retake the bow so often.”
M    arais’s notation is actually amazing—remarkably precise for Baroque—his written-out ornaments and annotated articulations, that is. He is telling us quite exactly what he wants here. In Baroque, we are normally happy just to have the notes—the music, most of the music was not much more than a ‘sketch’. But Marais gives us these over-dotting and under-dotting—all these things that are far more than just the notes.”
T    ry to keep your [lower numbered] fingers on the string [as you execute a run of notes on the same string, or a ‘jump’ on the same string]. Do not lift your fingers or ‘leap’ across distances on the string. It’s not just the aesthetics of how it looks… it is also the tone, and your preparation for the notes that are to come.”
T    he longer notes must ‘breathe’. Your bowing must give them a gentle ‘inhalation’. When you breathe in, the flow of air into your lungs begins slowly, then speeds up in the middle, and then slows down as your lungs get close to being full. Your bow must mimic this respiration.”
Y    ou have, I think, too much ‘investment’ in your attack of each note, and neglecting the arc of the overall [musical] sentence. You are too concerned that we will understand where each measure begins and ends. Think of reducing your commitment to the barline. Do not be so invested in the first beat of each measure. We need to know what the sentence is, not what the measure is.”
D    o not accent the second beat of ‘3-2’ hemiolas.”
I    f diction of a fast phrase becomes ‘confused’, bow closer to the bridge, so less bow motion is needed to pronounce each note. You can be closer than that… [about 3 cm].”
T    oo much wrist-extension is a bad temptation. It means your wrist is all the way back—extended so that it cannot be flexible or extend anymore. You want your wrist in a neutral position, so that it can be fluid. Your bow should just float there. If your wrist is in the middle of its range of motion, neutral like that, then you will not have to use so much ‘arm’ as you are doing. Your tone can then be much more expressive.”
M    ore ‘uplift’ in your bowing, please. You should bow as though you were a lute, plucking each note! The clear, ringing tone at the end of each note should be uplifted like a lute string sounds.”
P  hilippe Pierlot has taught at the Conservatoire Maastricht ands Hochschule fûr Musik Trossingen and currently teaches viola da gamba in
the Hague (Koninklijk Conservatorium) and Brussels. It is sheer fun to see him teach. His manner is intense and thoroughgoing but generous. His smile and excitement are infectious. Each little illustration of what he wants—each 2 or three bar demonstration he performs for a masterclass student—is a mini-concert in its own right, a candid snapshot of his real self. Magic.





Sunday, June 17, 2007

Hoeprich & Historical Clarinet: Searching for and Finding the Genuine Article

Eric Hoeprich
DSM: The performance of Nachtmusique at the Boston Early Music Festival (BEMF) illuminated several aspects of historical wind performance practice. Eric Hoeprich took a moment during the performance to explain to the audience the construction of 18th century clarinets and bassoons. Having only 5 keys, these instruments compel the performer to use a wide array of exotic “alternate” fingerings in order to realize the whole chromatic scale. And, as a result of these fingerings, the varying segments of the shaft of the instrument that are open, patterns of open tone-holes, and so on — the physics of the air column and the timbre of the instrument are tremendously different, not just across the registers but within each octave and from note to note. The timbral texture of the music is strikingly different when played on these period instruments, compared to performances of these same pieces on modern instruments. Fascinating – as well as beautiful!

  • Nachtmusique (Eric Hoeprich, clarinets; Toni Salar-Verdú, clarinets; Javier Zafra & Eyal Streett, bassoon; Erwin Wieringa & Gijs Laceulle, horn; Gonzalo Ruiz, oboe; Kristian Bezuidenhout, harpsichord)
  • Mozart, selections from Die Zauberflöte, K. 620
  • Mozart, Quintett in E-flat, K. 452
  • Duvernoy, Allegro pour deux cors
  • Kreutzer, Allegro pour deux clarinettes
  • Weyse, Allegro pour deux bassoons
  • Beethoven, Sextett op. 71
CMT: Eric Hoeprich is a founding member of several chamber music groups, such as Nachtmusique, which features these wind instruments of the 18th century (not just clarinets, but basset horns and other exotics). He also collaborates with the Salomon Quartet, Artaria Quartet, Festitecs Quartet, Aston Magnon, Turner Quartet, Apponyo Quartet, Da Camara Houston and other chamber groups. Besides his performing, Eric is on the faculty at Conservatoire de Paris and the Royal Conservatory in The Hague and lectures in Oxford and Cambridge, several American universities and conservatories in Brussels, Oslo, and Würzburg.

DSM: Eric has a new book published this year by Yale University Press, on clarinet history and performance practice. Richard Taruskin once wrote “I am convinced that ‘historical’ performance today is not really historical; that a thin veneer of historicism clothes a performance style that is completely of our own time, and is in fact the most modern style around; and that the historical hardware has won its wide acceptance and above all its commercial viability precisely by virtue of its novelty, not its antiquity.” But that was 15 years ago, and Taruskin’s once notorious views can now be applied not only to performance practice but to the instruments themselves. Eric’s passion for old instruments induced him to collect clarinets of the 18th and 19th century. Particularly interesting in his collection is the instrument of Heinrich Baermann for which Carl von Weber wrote his concerti opp. 73 and 74, and for which Mozart composed his concerto for clarinet KV 622 and his quintet KV 581. Sometimes, when it proves impossible to use old instruments, Eric Hoeprich plays on copies he makes himself. Eric’s attention to historical detail is exacting – he is clearly a purist. But his scholarship and high standards for authenticity don’t drive the life out of his subject.

CMT: I loved his remarks to the audience last night “How would Mozart feel about such a copy? Well, we have to acknowledge that these designs were, for Mozart and his contemporaries, ‘modern’ instruments in their day. And I’m not sure that Baermann or Lotz would necessarily have wanted to play a 250 year-old clarinet.”

DSM: There are quite noticeable differences between the technique of French and German clarinetists, and Hoeprich’s playing is faithful to these – as part of his historicism. By 1800, some specific, national characteristics in clarinet design had emerged, and he has published analyses of French and German instruments and given talks on these in recent symposia. In Paris, Frédéric Berr, for example, cited specific local clarinet makers in his Traité of 1836, as did several others, such as Fröhlich in Würzburg, Backofen in Darmstadt and Fahrbach in Vienna. With Hoeprich’s and Rice’s and Lawson’s and others’ careful study, the history of these wind instruments now approaches the depth characterizing strings, piano, and other instruments.

CMT: These books are a joy to read and a wonderful companion to the recordings and live performances. Bravo!