Showing posts with label taylor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label taylor. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

How Early Should/Can ‘Early’ Music Be? - Crwths and Other Ancient Instruments

Crwth
CMT: Early Music History is devoted to the study of music roughly from the early Middle Ages to the end of the seventeenth century. But why stop there? Why not go back further, to Dark Ages, to Roman and Greek times, to Egyptian or Phoenician times, or to Neolithic times, to the extent the archaeological record provides evidence for us to base the work on?

DSM: The survival of some archaeological fragments of instruments gives us one type of evidence, but don’t we really require some scores or fragments of scores? Surely you don’t mean that “recreations” of early music should devolve into purely conjectural composition, relying only on the properties of the physical instruments—or fragments of them—to guide the composer and performers!

CMT: Whenever the historical record is thin there’s a temptation to extemporize, to fill in gaps in a speculative way, or to engage in revisionist historiography—‘revisionist’ in the sense that the account is fanciful or biased according to which bits enter into the musicologists’ consideration. The processes that led to the preservation of some bits and the destruction of other bits are highly susceptible to socioeconomic and political power and other factors that differ among various segments of a society. Topography and the progress of urban civilization somewhat delimit what is possible to do, in terms of musicological history. For example, the archaeological record is scanty in rural areas, so the process is predominantly one of urban musicologicoethnography. So the propensity for historical evidence to survive strongly favors those factions who were in locations that were centers of power and wealth—and these of course were, and are, mostly cities. Some exceptions are folk instruments in closely-knit cultures. Medieval Wales, for example.

DSM: Oh, yes—the welsh crwth (“crooth”) evolved as a member of the lyre family. After about 800 C.E., a fingerboard was added and the crwth became, basically, a bowed lyre—a precursor to the modern violin. At one time crwths were widely used in Ireland, Scotland, and in Continental Europe, but by 1800 crwth playing was in decline, confined pretty much to Celtic Wales. But there’s been a recent revival of crwth playing in Early Music ensembles. And crwth-maker Hank Taylor was one of the exhibitors at last week’s Boston Early Music Festival. He played a medieval tune for me on one of his instruments when I visited him at his BEMF booth. Bwth?

CMT: Yes, I stopped by his booth too. The crwth bridge has this footed bridge — a ‘descender’ that extends through one of the bass ‘f-hole’ and serves as a de facto sound-post. Over the fingerboard, there are four pairs of strings, which can be stopped. There’re also a pair of bass drones that can be bowed or plucked by the thumb. Several historical tunings for the crwth have been established.

DSM: The crwth’s back, sides, and yoke are made of walnut, the top is spruce, and the fingerboard and tailpiece are maple. Beautiful, delicate. The construction and placement of the tuning pegs do make it difficult to keep the instrument in tune. Hank Taylor mitigates this problem by using modern fine tuners. All other aspects of the instrument’s design and construction are faithfully reproduced from historical instruments. Taylor’s crwths are careful copies of the crwth in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts Historical Instrument Collection.

Crwth, detail of tuners
CMT: Besides Taylor, a number of other modern crwth reproductions have been made, by Guy Flockhart, Nial Cain, and Gerard Kilbride, to name a few. A handful of early music artists are reviving the tradition of playing this instrument, among them Cass Meurig, Bob Evans, and Dan Morris. The repertoire of surviving crwth tunes is tiny, but arrangements can readily be prepared of various traditional tunes. And new works are being written for crwth as well.

DSM: The crwth can be played on the shoulder like a violin, between the knees like a viola da gamba, on the lap (either upright or at an oblique angle across the player’s torso against the left shoulder), or braced against the chest and supported with a neck strap. While the crwth can be held at the shoulder, it’s hard to play the drone strings with it in that position. The sloping bridge strongly suggests that the oblique-upright position across the upper body was used to allow the bow to be pulled upward without rubbing against the bridge, and to allow easier plucking of the drone strings. The acute angle of the bow to the strings would have produced a harsh timbre, one that some performers actually prefer for the effect they want to achieve. But, because the art of crwth-playing died out so completely, the tunings employed and the details of performance technique will probably never be known with any certainty.

CMT: The tone of the crwth can seem rough compared to that of the modern violin. And the crwth can be played only in what string players refer to as first position, with the left hand at the far end of the fingerboard rather than moving up towards the bridge. Listening to Hank Taylor play, though, it’s clearly capable of a delicate sound. For all its technical limitations, the crwth is obviously much more than a historical curiosity.

DSM: The ‘modern’ crwth appears to date from only the late fifteenth or early sixteenth century. Almost surely it’s not, as some accounts assert, the same instrument that was played by Egyptians or ancient bards. According to Taylor, the crwth’s close ancestors became instruments of the folk culture of Wales and the West Country and western Midlands following the phasing-out of minstrelsy in Britain at the close of the Middle Ages. And the crwth’s definitive form probably emerged around the end of the 15th century, confined to Wales. Although the modern crwth overtly resembles the classical lyre, it’s frankly more closely related to the plucked and bowed square and round lyres that paintings and sculptures show existed in northern Europe from as far back as the mid-700’s C.E. Any connections between the European round and square lyres and Middle-Eastern and Classical precursors are thought by many to be tenuous. Hank Taylor and others do maintain that ‘some connection’ to pre-Hellenic lyre prototypes is supported by physical anthropological and archeological evidence, though.

CMT: In view of our previous conversation, how far should we (and can we) go toward the past, as opposed to trying to bring the past toward us? In practical terms, how far should we go in attempting to re-create the specific conditions (instrument design, vocal techniques, orchestration, tunings, etc.) of the time, as opposed to using the most up-to-date media available or making compromises between the two extremes? This fundamental question—with the many different ways in which musicians answer it and the controversies that result—is what makes ‘Historically Informed Performance’ (HIP) the most interesting (in the sense, perhaps, of that ancient Chinese curse?) and dynamic field in early music today. ‘Modern’ crwths!


Egyptian Crwth


Thursday, December 28, 2006

Cultural Ecology: The ‘We’ that We Create

Novelli, Cultural Ecology
“Why has policy had so much trouble generating a body of knowledge capable of playing a significant role in solving the pressing social and economic problems that confront modern urban-industrial societies? An important part of the answer can be traced to discredited, but still operative, empiricist epistemological assumptions.”
   — Frank Fischer


DSM: I very much admire and value non-government organizations (NGOs) like Chamber Music America ( CMA ), chartered to foster and promote greater understanding and public awareness. I belong to CMA not just for the material benefits that CMA offers its members:



[To see how to incorporate external html content into Blogger posts, view the source for this page and look at the iframe tags. Despite the deprecated status of iframe, the iframe mechanism at least seems to work in the body of Blogger posts in all browsers, while object and other html and javascript alternatives break.
  • Add 20px to width in table tr spec –if, for example, a table is 390 wide, make the iframe width 410. The absolute px spec seems to be necessary; percentage width spec breaks, even in fluid templates, at least in IE.
  • Measure height and explicitly set iframe height parm.
  • Search and delete Excel-SaveAs html span 'mso' tags.
  • Include hard nonbreaking-spacing tags where needed. ]

CMT: You’re right. NEA was once upon a time the “glue” that held together the entire infrastructure for public funding of the arts in the U.S. But under conservative congress and administrations it has been drastically reduced and constrained. So nonprofits like CMA—always important—are progressively more and more important these days.

DSM: What’s remarkable is how under-appreciated culture is as a national resource—the accumulated capital of each community's (and each nation's – ) ingenuity and creativity. It’s the store of human achievement and cultural memory as well as a source of future creativity and innovation. Our cultural capital has increasing value in a global, knowledge-based economy, and as a key social source as people around the world seek to conserve their identities (including passing it on to coming generations) and to understand others’ cultures. Arts nonprofit trade groups like CMA strive to foster a national conversation about cultural assets and identity.

CMT: Remarkable. Remarkable and frustrating. Policymaking at the federal level relevant to the arts, humanities, and cultural preservation often has been fragmented and fraught with changing political winds. The lack of stability jeopardizes the goal of cultural conservation.

DSM: Cultural policy in the U.S. remains basically a patchwork of arrangements that involve allocating resources and arbitrating value. As an advocate for artist-centered and diverse cultural practices, I’m worried about these arrangements, especially the politics of it. Whose voices are privileged or marginalized in policy discourse: the artists, the government arts administrator, the presenters, the business partners, the foundation program officer, the academics, or the civic leader? How do policies inscribe all members of society with the power of existing interest groups and elites?

CMT: NGOs like CMA strengthen the cultural sector—they serve as a vital ‘check-and-balance’ on government agencies and business sponsors and make the policy arrangements more equitable and fair.

DSM: Communitarian ethics and discursive ethics and analysis enable innovation, debate, power sharing, agenda setting and policy-making practices that acknowledge our pluralism. That’s part of what’s needed, and it’s part of what organizations like CMA do. Policy Studies is not the answer! Policy Studies is a field that exalts “policy” as an empirical science and presumes that facts can be separated from value. This purely empirical stance is mistaken—its epistemological assumptions are incorrect, to paraphrase Fischer. Also, Policy Studies fails to acknowledge the motives and needs of community-based organizations and constituencies. Yes, Policy Studies can be valuable when performing program evaluations of quantifiable, measurable components. It’s a good tool for ‘administering’ a program. But it’s inadequate when it comes to artists, creativity and capturing how imagination enlivens our ‘social imaginaries’ as Charles Taylor calls them.

CMT: Taylor and other post-empiricists don’t reject the validity and value of empirical measurements where they’re possible to do. They simply offer additional methods of working with subjective experience, with poiesis—‘bringing into being’—that is central to music and the arts and aesthetic experiences.

“I adopt the term imaginary because my focus is on the way ordinary people ‘imagine’ their social surrounding, and this is often not expressed in theoretical terms but is carried in images, stories and legends.”
   — Charles Taylor


DSM: So Taylor and Fischer and others avoid privileging the ideal of objectivity. They positively engage with the subjective social meanings and motives framing policy-making and how the ‘social imaginary’ contributes to society. They tackle xenophobia and cultural policy arbitration; the increasing privatization of the non-profit cultural sector; the rise of social networking and its impact on cultural production; the cultural policy narratives of public goods and public interest and how they operate in relation to one another.


Cultural Content